Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026

Three-Dimensional (3D) Tumor Spheroid Invasion Assay
Published on: May 1, 2015
Impact of targeting insulin-like growth factor signaling in head and neck cancers
Kirsten H Limesand1, Alejandro Martinez Chibly, Andrew Fribley
1Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA. limesank@u.arizona.edu
Abstract:
The IGF system has been shown to have either negative or negligible impact on clinical outcomes of tumor development depending on specific tumor sites or stages. This review focuses on the clinical impact of IGF signaling in head and neck cancer, the effects of IGF targeted therapies, and the multi-dimensional role of IRS 1/2 signaling as a potential mechanism in resistance to targeted therapies. Similar to other tumor sites, both negative and positive correlations between levels of IGF-1/IGF-1-R and clinical outcomes in head and neck cancer have been reported. In addition, utilization of IGF targeted therapies has not demonstrated significant clinical benefit; therefore the prognostic impact of the IGF system on head and neck cancer remains uncertain.
Insights
The Insulin-like Growth Factor (IGF) system
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Molecular Biology
- Cancer Research
Background:
- The Insulin-like Growth Factor (IGF) system plays a complex role in tumor development.
- Its impact on clinical outcomes varies significantly across different cancer types and stages.
- Understanding IGF signaling is crucial for developing effective cancer treatments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the clinical impact of IGF signaling in head and neck cancer.
- To examine the efficacy of IGF-targeted therapies in this context.
- To explore the role of IRS 1/2 signaling in therapeutic resistance.
Main Methods:
- Literature review focusing on studies investigating IGF system components (IGF-1, IGF-1R) and IRS 1/2 signaling.
- Analysis of reported correlations between IGF markers and clinical outcomes in head and neck cancer.
- Evaluation of clinical trial data for IGF-targeted therapies.
Main Results:
- Correlations between IGF-1/IGF-1R levels and head and neck cancer outcomes are inconsistent, showing both positive and negative associations.
- IGF-targeted therapies have not yet shown significant clinical benefits in head and neck cancer.
- IRS 1/2 signaling is implicated as a potential mechanism contributing to resistance against these therapies.
Conclusions:
- The prognostic significance of the IGF system in head and neck cancer remains uncertain due to conflicting data.
- Current IGF-targeted therapies lack demonstrated efficacy.
- Further research into resistance mechanisms, such as IRS 1/2 signaling, is warranted.
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Mitogens and the Cell Cycle
mTOR Signaling and Cancer Progression
The mTOR pathway or the...
