Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Photoreceptors and Visual Pathways01:22

Photoreceptors and Visual Pathways

At the molecular level, visual signals trigger transformations in photopigment molecules, resulting in changes in the photoreceptor cell's membrane potential. The photon's energy level is denoted by its wavelength, with each specific wavelength of visible light associated with a distinct color. The spectral range of visible light, classified as electromagnetic radiation, spans from 380 to 720 nm. Electromagnetic radiation wavelengths exceeding 720 nm fall under the infrared category, whereas...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Chronic sleep restriction induces oculomotor impairment with inadequate compensation.

Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society·2026
Same author

Effects of binocularity and eye dominance on visually-driven ocular tracking.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2025
Same author

Oculometric biomarkers of visuomotor deficits in clinically asymptomatic patients with systemic lupus erythematosus undergoing long-term hydroxychloroquine treatment.

Frontiers in ophthalmology·2024
Same author

Differential saccade-pursuit coordination under sleep loss and low-dose alcohol.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2023
Same author

Visuomotor predictors of batting performance in baseball players.

Journal of vision·2021
Same author

Dose-dependent sensorimotor impairment in human ocular tracking after acute low-dose alcohol administration.

The Journal of physiology·2020
Same journal

Analysis of human visual experience data.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Pyramid-based Bayesian modeling for high-resolution behavioral analysis.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Sensation without perception: The white whale effect and perceptual blindness in autonomous vehicles.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Gaze behavior during closed-captioned movie viewing adapts to absent audio through more frequent switching between text and scene.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

In pursuit of saccade awareness: Limited volitional control and minimal conscious access to catch-up saccades during smooth pursuit eye movements.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Dissociable effects of element-lifetime and stimulus-duration on local and global motion processing: An equivalent noise study.

Journal of vision·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 10, 2026

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Saccadic brightness decisions do not use a difference model.

Dorion B Liston1, Leland S Stone

  • 1NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA. dorion.b.liston@nasa.gov

Journal of Vision
|July 3, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study reveals that primate eye movements align with a "race" model of decision-making, not a "difference" model. This finding advances our understanding of sensorimotor control and choice behavior.

Keywords:
choice behaviordecision modelresponse time

More Related Videos

An Automated Squint Method for Time-syncing Behavior and Brain Dynamics in Mouse Pain Studies
05:49

An Automated Squint Method for Time-syncing Behavior and Brain Dynamics in Mouse Pain Studies

Published on: November 1, 2024

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

An Automated Squint Method for Time-syncing Behavior and Brain Dynamics in Mouse Pain Studies
05:49

An Automated Squint Method for Time-syncing Behavior and Brain Dynamics in Mouse Pain Studies

Published on: November 1, 2024

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Systems Neuroscience

Background:

  • Voluntary eye movements are frequent, rapid, and biomechanically simple primate behaviors.
  • They serve as a model system for sensorimotor decision-making.
  • Existing computational models include
  • difference
  • and
  • race
  • mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To empirically test predictions of difference vs. race models of choice behavior.
  • To investigate the neural mechanisms underlying saccadic decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • A two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) task involving a saccadic brightness discrimination.
  • Analysis of response time (RT) and signal strengths of selected/unselected stimuli.

Main Results:

  • Observed positive correlations between response rate (1/RT) and the strength of both selected and unselected stimuli.
  • These findings contradict predictions of difference models.
  • Data are qualitatively consistent with race models.

Conclusions:

  • The results support a
  • race
  • mechanism where competing neural decision variables race to a threshold.
  • This challenges difference-based models for explaining saccadic decision-making.