Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026

Prehospital Thrombolysis: A Manual from Berlin
Published on: November 26, 2013
Views of emergency physicians on thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke
Bentley J Bobrow1, Bart M Demaerschalk, Joseph P Wood
1Department of Emergency Medicine Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona.
Background:
The 3-hour window for treating stroke with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) requires well-organized, integrated efforts by emergency physicians and stroke neurologists.
Objective:
To evaluate attitudes and knowledge of emergency physicians about intravenous t-PA for acute ischemic stroke, particularly in primary stroke centers (PSCs) with stroke neurology teams.
Methods:
A 15-question pilot Internet survey administered by the Arizona College of Emergency Physicians.
Results:
Between March and August 2005, 100 emergency physicians responded: 71 in Arizona and 29 in Missouri. Forty-eight percent practiced at PSCs; 48% thought t-PA was effective, 20% did not, and 32% were uncertain. PSC or non-PSC location of practice did not influence endorsement (odds ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-1.64). Of those opposing t-PA, 87% cited risk of hemorrhage.
Conclusions:
Most emergency physicians did not endorse t-PA. Improved collaboration between emergency physicians and stroke neurologists is needed.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Ischemic Stroke ll: Pathophysiology
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism III: Nursing Management
