Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Predator-Prey Interactions02:39

Predator-Prey Interactions

Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
Optimal Foraging00:48

Optimal Foraging

How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
What are Populations and Communities?00:30

What are Populations and Communities?

Overview
Microbial Interactions: Predation01:28

Microbial Interactions: Predation

Microbial predation refers to the process by which one microorganism kills and consumes another to obtain nutrients and energy. It encompasses both bacterial and protozoan predators. This interaction plays a crucial role in shaping microbial communities and regulating nutrient cycling.Bacterial Predators: Epibiotic vs. EndobioticBacterial predators are classified based on their mode of attack as either epibiotic or endobiotic. Epibiotic predators, such as Vampirococcus, attach to the surface of...
Energy Budgets00:51

Energy Budgets

Organisms must balance energy intake with the energy required for growth, maintenance and reproduction. These trade-offs result in a variety of survivorship and reproductive strategies, including semelparity and iteroparity. Semelparous species, like annual plants, have only one reproductive episode in their lifetimes and consequently have short lifespans. Iteroparous species, by contrast, have many reproductive events during their lifetimes but have relatively few offspring. These two...
Production Efficiency01:01

Production Efficiency

Net production efficiency (NPE) is the efficiency at which organisms assimilate energy into biomass for the next trophic level. Due to low metabolic rates and less energy spent on thermoregulatory processes, the NPE of ectotherms (cold-blooded animals) is 10 times higher than endotherms (warm-blooded animals).

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Global synthesis reveals systematic variation in trophic transfer efficiency across and within ecosystems.

Science advances·2026
Same author

Food web complexity underlies biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning.

Nature·2026
Same author

Shift in Soil Fauna Feeding Mode With Litter Quality Across Forest Biomes.

Ecology letters·2026
Same author

Publisher Correction: Greater trophic diversity of soil animal communities under agricultural land use and tropical climate.

Nature ecology & evolution·2026
Same author

Greater trophic diversity of soil animal communities under agricultural land use and tropical climate.

Nature ecology & evolution·2026
Same author

Degradation of fish food webs in the Anthropocene.

Science advances·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 10, 2026

A Fish-feeding Laboratory Bioassay to Assess the Antipredatory Activity of Secondary Metabolites from the Tissues of Marine Organisms
16:03

A Fish-feeding Laboratory Bioassay to Assess the Antipredatory Activity of Secondary Metabolites from the Tissues of Marine Organisms

Published on: January 11, 2015

Body masses, functional responses and predator-prey stability.

Gregor Kalinkat1, Florian D Schneider, Christoph Digel

  • 1Department of Biology, Darmstadt University of Technology, Schnittspahnstr. 10, Darmstadt, 64287, Germany. kalinkat@bio.tu-darmstadt.de

Ecology Letters
|July 4, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Ecological community stability relies on predator-prey interactions and body mass. This study introduces generalized functional responses, linking these factors to predict population dynamics and food web stability.

Keywords:
Allometric scalingbody sizeconsumer-resourceecological modellingfeeding ratefood websinteraction strengthmetabolic theory

More Related Videos

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems
07:41

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems

Published on: July 30, 2019

Linking Predation Risk, Herbivore Physiological Stress and Microbial Decomposition of Plant Litter
10:20

Linking Predation Risk, Herbivore Physiological Stress and Microbial Decomposition of Plant Litter

Published on: March 12, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 10, 2026

A Fish-feeding Laboratory Bioassay to Assess the Antipredatory Activity of Secondary Metabolites from the Tissues of Marine Organisms
16:03

A Fish-feeding Laboratory Bioassay to Assess the Antipredatory Activity of Secondary Metabolites from the Tissues of Marine Organisms

Published on: January 11, 2015

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems
07:41

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems

Published on: July 30, 2019

Linking Predation Risk, Herbivore Physiological Stress and Microbial Decomposition of Plant Litter
10:20

Linking Predation Risk, Herbivore Physiological Stress and Microbial Decomposition of Plant Litter

Published on: March 12, 2013

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Food web dynamics
  • Ecological stoichiometry

Background:

  • Ecological community stability is influenced by population interaction types (e.g., type-II vs. type-III functional responses) and species body mass distribution.
  • These critical factors have been studied in isolation, creating a knowledge gap in understanding complex food web structures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between predator-prey body masses and functional response parameters.
  • To develop generalized functional responses that bridge the gap between predation type and body mass.
  • To model population dynamics and persistence based on these generalized responses.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of a large dataset on arthropod feeding rates.
  • Development of generalized functional response models incorporating predator and prey body masses.
  • Validation of model predictions using empirical data from forest soil food webs.

Main Results:

  • All functional response parameters were found to be dependent on predator and prey body masses.
  • Generalized functional responses predict a shift from type-II to type-III responses as predator size increases relative to prey size.
  • Models incorporating these generalized responses accurately predict population dynamics and persistence in empirical food webs.

Conclusions:

  • Body mass is a unifying factor that quantitatively links predator-prey interactions and food web stability.
  • Generalized functional responses provide a more comprehensive framework for understanding food web structure and dynamics.
  • This research resolves systematic relationships between quantitative population interactions and large-scale community patterns.