Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026

Transcorporal Artificial Urinary Sphincter Cuff Placement in a Case Requiring Revision for Urethral Atrophy
Published on: June 16, 2022
Difference between urethral circumference and artificial urinary sphincter cuff size, and its effect on postoperative
Jennifer Rothschild1, Laura Chang Kit2, Lara Seltz3
1Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Purpose:
We assessed whether a difference between intraoperative urethral circumference and artificial urinary sphincter cuff size affects postoperative outcomes.
Materials And Methods:
We evaluated the medical records of 87 males who underwent implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter between January 2006 and May 2010. A validated questionnaire was completed by 59 patients for long-term followup. The difference between urethral circumference and artificial urinary sphincter cuff size was calculated. Incontinence was recorded as daily pad use. The primary outcome variable was the postoperative decrease in incontinence. Multivariable linear regression was used to model the effect on postoperative incontinence of the difference between urethral circumference and cuff size.
Results:
Mean long-term followup was 4.2 years. Median preoperative incontinence was 8 pads per day and median abdominal leak point pressure was 50 cm H2O. Median urethral circumference was 38 mm and the median difference between urethral circumference and artificial urinary sphincter cuff size was 2.5 mm. Median postoperative incontinence was 1 pad per day. A 1 mm increase in the difference between urethral circumference and cuff size resulted in a 1.6% increase in incontinence by 4.5 months postoperatively (95% CI -3.1-6.2, p = 0.487). Paradoxically, each 1 mm increase improved postoperative continence at long-term followup by 29% (95% CI -15-56, p = 0.162).
Conclusions:
At 4.5-month followup there was no statistical difference in pad use or patient satisfaction when the difference between urethral circumference and artificial urinary sphincter cuff size was less than 4 mm vs 4 mm or greater. However, at long-term followup the 4 mm or greater group reported statistically significantly better continence and satisfaction than the less than 4 mm group. This study does not support efforts to improve continence by minimizing cuff size but rather suggests that modestly up-sizing the cuff may produce improved long-term outcomes.
More Related Videos
10:07Cystometric and External Urethral Sphincter Measurements in Awake Rats with Implanted Catheter and Electrodes Allowing for Repeated Measurements
Published on: January 30, 2018
05:09Urethral Stricture Induction Followed by Buccal Mucosa Graft Urethroplasty in a Rat Model
Published on: April 28, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Urodynamic Studies: Uroflowmetry
Anatomy of the Genitourinary System II: Bladder and Urethra
Urethra
The anatomy of the urethra differs between males and females. In females, the urethra is short, measuring about 3–4 cm in length, and opens anterior to the vaginal opening. In males, the urethra is longer and passes through the penis, serving dual purposes: expelling urine and ejaculating semen. The male urethra is...
Urologic Endoscopic Procedure: Cystoscopic Examination
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Imaging Studies VI: Voiding Cystourethrography and Cystography