Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers

Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers

In certain scenarios, in vitro dissolution tests can replace in vivo bioequivalence studies. This is particularly true when a drug product, though available in varying strengths, maintains proportional similarity in its active and inactive ingredients. In such cases, the need for in vivo bioequivalence studies for lower strength variants may be waived, provided dissolution tests and in vivo studies on the highest strength yield satisfactory results.Bioequivalence can be indicated through...

Protein Folding Quality Check in the RER

Protein Folding Quality Check in the RER

ER is the primary site for the maturation and folding of soluble and transmembrane secretory proteins. The calnexin cycle is a specific chaperone system that folds and assesses the confirmation of N-glycosylated proteins before they can exit the ER lumen. The primary players of this quality check pipeline are the lectins, ER-resident chaperones, and a glucosyl transferase enzyme. In case the calnexin system in the lumen fails to salvage a misfolded protein, it is transported to the cytoplasm...

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...

Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients

Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients

Bioavailability studies are essential for evaluating a drug's therapeutic efficacy and understanding its absorption patterns under various physiological conditions. Conducting such studies on target patient populations provides more relevant data by simulating real-world disease states. However, practical challenges often necessitate the use of young, healthy adult volunteers as study subjects.Patients may exhibit altered drug absorption patterns due to the effects of the disease itself,...

Proofreading

Proofreading

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Expanding the Autosomal Recessive Hypophosphatemic Rickets Type I Carrier Phenotype and Adult Treatment with Burosumab.

Calcified tissue international·2026

Same author

Automated bone age calculation is an independent predictor of vertebral fracture burden in Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2025

Same author

Vertebral Body Reshaping after Fractures: An Important Index of Recovery in Glucocorticoid-Treated Children.

The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism·2023

Same author

Risk Factors Associated with Incident Vertebral Fractures in Steroid-treated Males with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.

The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism·2023

Same author

Reductions in Bone Mineral Density Are Apparent Early in Children With Prevalent Osteonecrosis Lesions Following Leukemia Therapy.

Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research·2023

Same author

Comparison of Body Composition, Muscle Strength and Cardiometabolic Profile in Children with Prader-Willi Syndrome and Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Pilot Study.

International journal of molecular sciences·2022

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 10, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

A workstation-integrated peer review quality assurance program: pilot study.

Margaret M O'Keeffe¹, Todd M Davis, Kerry Siminoski

¹Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, and Medical Imaging Consultants, 11010-101 Street, Edmonton, AB T5H 4B9, Canada.

BMC Medical Imaging

|July 5, 2013

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

A workstation-integrated peer review program achieved high concordance (99.4%) in radiology assessments. This efficient system identified few significant discrepancies (0.6%) and was deemed worthwhile by most radiologists.

More Related Videos

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 10, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Area of Science:

Radiology
Medical Informatics
Quality Improvement

Background:

Radiologist assessment consistency is key to radiological excellence.
Peer review is the standard for evaluating concordance in radiology.
This study evaluates a workstation-integrated peer review program in an outpatient setting.

Purpose of the Study:

To assess the effectiveness and integration of a workstation-based peer review system.
To determine the concordance rates and identify discrepancies in radiology reports.
To gather feedback from radiologists on the peer review process.

Main Methods:

Workstation-based peer review utilized Intelerad Peer Review software.
Cases were randomly selected from active reports for review.
The modified RADPEER system was used for scoring, with prior studies considered when available.

Main Results:

99.1% agreement between reviewing and interpreting radiologists.
99.4% concordance achieved, with only 0.6% of cases showing clinically significant discrepancies.
88% of radiologists found the reviews worthwhile; 65% found feedback appropriate.

Conclusions:

The workstation-based peer review system integrated seamlessly into the workday.
The system met criteria for an ideal peer review process, identifying significant discrepancies at rates comparable to the RADPEER system.
Radiologists found the peer review process valuable and worthwhile.