Risk factors for congenital anomaly in a multiethnic birth cohort: an analysis of the Born in Bradford study

Eamonn Sheridan1, John Wright, Neil Small

  • 1Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK; Department of Genetics, Wellcome Trust Brenner Building, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.

PubMed

Insights

Consanguinity significantly increases the risk of congenital anomalies, particularly in Pakistani communities. Higher maternal education levels offer protection across all ethnic groups, highlighting a key factor for public health interventions.

Area of Science:

  • Reproductive Health
  • Genetics
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Congenital anomalies are a primary cause of infant mortality and disability in the UK.
  • Infant mortality rates are highest among children of Pakistani origin, with congenital anomalies being the leading cause of death in this group.
  • Investigated the incidence of congenital anomalies in a multiethnic birth cohort to understand excess risk in specific communities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify the causes of increased congenital anomaly incidence in specific ethnic groups.
  • To determine the association between consanguinity and congenital anomalies.
  • To explore the impact of maternal education and deprivation on anomaly risk.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized questionnaire data from mothers in the prospective Born in Bradford birth cohort study (2007-2011).
  • Cross-referenced reported anomalies with medical records for accuracy.
  • Employed univariate and multivariate risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to analyze maternal risk factors.

Main Results:

  • Congenital anomaly rates were 305.74 per 10,000 livebirths, higher than the national rate (165.90 per 10,000).
  • Mothers of Pakistani origin had a higher risk (RR 1.96).
  • Consanguinity (first-cousin unions) doubled the risk (RR 2.19), accounting for 31% of anomalies in Pakistani origin children. Maternal education to degree level was protective (RR 0.53).

Conclusions:

  • Consanguinity is a significant risk factor for congenital anomalies, independent of deprivation.
  • Consanguinity explains a substantial proportion of congenital anomalies in babies of Pakistani origin.
  • Higher maternal education is associated with reduced risk across all ethnic groups, informing targeted health promotion strategies.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This phenomenon...
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs01:23

Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs

Behavior genetics explores how genetic inheritance influences human behavior. It focuses on how genes, passed from parents to offspring, contribute to the development of behavioral traits and tendencies. This branch of genetics seeks to understand the complex interplay between inherited genetic factors and environmental influences in shaping our behaviors.
The primary methodologies used in behavior genetics include family studies, twin studies, and adoption studies, each providing unique...
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when researchers try to extrapolate results...