Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Case Studies01:22

Case Studies

There are many research methods available to psychologists in their efforts to understand, describe, and explain behavior and the cognitive and biological processes that underlie it.
Surveys02:16

Surveys

Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
Factorial Design02:01

Factorial Design

Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
Group Design02:01

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between the two are due to...
Factors Influencing Attraction I: Proximity01:22

Factors Influencing Attraction I: Proximity

Proximity plays a fundamental role in shaping interpersonal attraction by increasing opportunities for interaction and fostering familiarity. Research consistently demonstrates that individuals are more likely to form social bonds with those who are physically closer to them, whether in residential settings, workplaces, or educational institutions. This effect is largely driven by the increased frequency of encounters, which facilitates the development of friendships and romantic...
Cross-Sectional Research01:50

Cross-Sectional Research

In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Classroom ecology: relations between seating location, performance, and attendance.

Psychological reports·2010
See all related articles

Related Experiment Videos

Factors in students' seat selection: an exploratory study.

Marta Losonczy-Marshall1, P Douglas Marshall

  • 1Salisbury University, 1101 Camden Avenue, Salisbury, MD 21801, USA. melosonczy@salisbury.edu

Psychological Reports
|July 10, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Students select seats based on performance, social factors, and noticeability, with seating choices influenced by classroom location. These findings offer insights into student behavior and classroom dynamics.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Educational Psychology
  • Classroom Environment Studies
  • Student Behavior Research

Background:

  • Understanding student seat selection is crucial for optimizing learning environments.
  • Previous research has explored factors influencing student choices, but a comprehensive analysis of specific reasons and their spatial correlation is needed.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the underlying reasons for college students' seating preferences in classrooms.
  • To identify key factors influencing seat selection and analyze their relationship with seating location.

Main Methods:

  • A questionnaire assessing 20 seat-selection reasons was administered to 346 college students across 12 classes.
  • Exploratory factor analysis identified five primary seat-selection factors: Performance, Social, Asocial, Noticeability, and Environment.
  • Seat-selection factors were analyzed in relation to seating position (row, front/middle/back, center/perimeter, mid-room/sides).

Main Results:

  • Performance and Noticeability factors decreased from the front to the back rows.
  • The Asocial factor was higher for students in back rows.
  • The Environment factor was rated higher by students in the center of the room.

Conclusions:

  • Student seat selection is multifaceted, influenced by academic performance, social interaction, and environmental perceptions.
  • Seating location significantly correlates with specific seat-selection factors, indicating a spatial dimension to student preferences.
  • Findings can inform classroom design and pedagogical strategies to enhance student engagement and learning outcomes.