BAHA implant: implantation technique and complications
N Fontaine1, P Hemar1, P Schultz1
1Service d'ORL, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, 1, avenue Molière, 67100 Strasbourg, France.
Summary
The skin flap technique for BAHA implants showed fewer complications than skin grafts, though not significantly. Hypertrophic scarring was the most frequent issue in this conductive hearing loss study.
Area of Science:
- Otolaryngology
- Neurosurgery
- Plastic Surgery
Background:
- Bone Anchored Hearing Aid (BAHA) implants effectively treat conductive hearing loss.
- Titanium abutments can cause severe skin reactions, necessitating surgical technique evaluation.
- Comparing skin flap and full-thickness skin graft techniques is crucial for managing BAHA-related skin complications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of skin flap versus full-thickness skin graft techniques in managing BAHA implant-related skin complications.
- To identify the most common types of skin complications associated with each surgical technique.
- To assess the rate of surgical revisions required for complications in both groups.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective study included 41 BAHA implants in 32 patients between January 2004 and January 2011.
- Patients were surgically treated using either a skin flap (n=20) or a full-thickness skin graft (n=21) technique.
- Skin complications, including necrosis, infection, hypertrophic scarring, and fixture loss, were documented and analyzed.
Main Results:
- Complications requiring surgical revision occurred in 20% of skin flap cases and 38% of skin graft cases.
- No statistically significant difference in complication rates was found between the two techniques (P=0.31).
- Hypertrophic scarring was the most frequently observed complication across both groups.
Conclusions:
- The skin graft technique may be associated with a higher rate of major complications compared to the skin flap technique.
- Hypertrophic scarring is the predominant complication observed.
- A potential selection bias, excluding complication-free patients, might explain the observed complication rates.

