Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2026

Upper-extremity Approach for Secondary Access in Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Published on: August 8, 2025
Geographic variation in cardiovascular procedure use among Medicare fee-for-service vs Medicare Advantage
Daniel D Matlock1, Peter W Groeneveld, Steve Sidney
1Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA. daniel.matlock@ucdenver.edu
Insights
Medicare Advantage beneficiaries had lower rates of angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared to Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) patients, but geographic variations in procedure use were substantial and similar across both payment models.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Health Services Research
- Health Economics
Background:
- Reimbursement structures in Medicare Advantage (MA) and Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) differ, potentially influencing cardiovascular procedure utilization.
- Understanding these differences is crucial for equitable healthcare delivery and resource allocation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare regional cardiovascular procedure rates between MA and Medicare FFS beneficiaries.
- To investigate the impact of financial incentives on cardiovascular procedure use.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study analyzed Medicare beneficiaries aged over 65 from 2003-2007.
- Rates of coronary angiography, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery were compared across 32 hospital referral regions in 12 states.
- Data included 878,339 MA patients and 5,013,650 Medicare FFS patients.
Main Results:
- MA beneficiaries showed lower age-, sex-, race-, and income-adjusted rates for angiography (16.5 vs 25.9 per 1000 person-years) and PCI (6.8 vs 9.8 per 1000 person-years) compared to FFS beneficiaries (P < .001 for both).
- CABG surgery rates were similar between MA and FFS beneficiaries (3.1 vs 3.4 per 1000 person-years; P = .33).
- Significant geographic variation in procedure rates was observed within both MA and FFS populations, with no strong correlation between MA and FFS utilization across regions for angiography, PCI, or CABG.
Conclusions:
- Despite lower angiography and PCI rates in MA compared to FFS, substantial and similar geographic variations in procedure rates exist across both Medicare programs.
- The findings highlight significant regional disparities in cardiovascular care delivery irrespective of the Medicare payment model.
- Further research is needed to understand the drivers of these geographic variations and their clinical implications.
Importance:
Little is known about how different financial incentives between Medicare Advantage and Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) reimbursement structures influence use of cardiovascular procedures.
Objective:
To compare regional cardiovascular procedure rates between Medicare Advantage and Medicare FFS beneficiaries.
Design, Setting, And Participants:
Cross-sectional study of Medicare beneficiaries older than 65 years between 2003-2007 comparing rates of coronary angiography, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery across 32 hospital referral regions in 12 states.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
Rates of coronary angiography, PCI, and CABG surgery.
Results:
We evaluated a total of 878,339 Medicare Advantage patients and 5,013,650 Medicare FFS patients. Compared with Medicare FFS patients, Medicare Advantage patients had lower age-, sex-, race-, and income-adjusted procedure rates per 1000 person-years for angiography (16.5 [95% CI, 14.8-18.2] vs 25.9 [95% CI, 24.0-27.9]; P < .001) and PCI (6.8 [95% CI, 6.0-7.6] vs 9.8 [95% CI, 9.0-10.6]; P < .001) but similar rates for CABG surgery (3.1 [95% CI, 2.8-3.5] vs 3.4 [95% CI, 3.1-3.7]; P = .33). There were no significant differences between Medicare Advantage and Medicare FFS patients in the rates per 1000 person-years of urgent angiography (3.9 [95% CI, 3.6-4.2] vs 4.3 [95% CI, 4.0-4.6]; P = .24) or PCI (2.4 [95% CI, 2.2-2.7] vs 2.7 [95% CI, 2.5-2.9]; P = .16). Procedure rates varied widely across hospital referral regions among Medicare Advantage and Medicare FFS patients. For angiography, the rates per 1000 person-years ranged from 9.8 to 40.6 for Medicare Advantage beneficiaries and from 15.7 to 44.3 for Medicare FFS beneficiaries. For PCI, the rates ranged from 3.5 to 16.8 for Medicare Advantage and from 4.7 to 16.1 for Medicare FFS. The rates for CABG surgery ranged from 1.5 to 6.1 for Medicare Advantage and from 2.5 to 6.0 for Medicare FFS. Across regions, we found no statistically significant correlation between Medicare Advantage and Medicare FFS beneficiary utilization for angiography (Spearman r = 0.19, P = .29) and modest correlations for PCI (Spearman r = 0.33, P = .06) and CABG surgery (Spearman r = 0.35, P = .05). Among Medicare Advantage beneficiaries, adjustment for additional cardiac risk factors had little influence on procedure rates.
Conclusions And Relevance:
Although Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in capitated Medicare Advantage programs had lower angiography and PCI procedure rates than those enrolled in Medicare FFS, the degree of geographic variation in procedure rates was substantial among Medicare Advantage beneficiaries and was similar in magnitude to that observed among Medicare FFS beneficiaries.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System I: Subjective Data
Initial Enquiry
Ask the patient about their primary concern and thoroughly explore all reported symptoms.
Medical History
Investigate past illnesses affecting the cardiovascular system, such as angina, anemia, rheumatic fever, congenital heart disease, stroke, thrombophlebitis, dysrhythmias, varicosities
Inquire about symptoms...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Cardiovascular Drugs: Classification based on Therapeutic Indications
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care