Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2026

A Noninvasive Hair Sampling Technique to Obtain High Quality DNA from Elusive Small Mammals
Published on: March 13, 2011
Determining Occurrence Dynamics when False Positives Occur: Estimating the Range Dynamics of Wolves from Public
David A W Miller1, James D Nichols, Justin A Gude
1United States Geological Survey, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, Maryland, United States of America ; Pennsylvania State University, Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Accurate wildlife monitoring requires accounting for errors in public surveys. This study develops methods to correct for false negatives and false positives in gray wolf (Canis lupus) population estimates.
Area of Science:
- Wildlife ecology and conservation
- Population dynamics modeling
- Statistical ecology
Background:
- Large-scale monitoring programs are crucial for conservation but can be limited by observational errors, particularly with public-collected data.
- Existing methods primarily address non-detection (false negatives), while misclassification errors (false positives) are less explored but common.
- Accurate estimation of species' occupancy and population dynamics is vital for effective conservation strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and demonstrate estimators for dynamic occupancy parameters (colonization and extinction) that simultaneously account for non-detection and misclassification errors.
- To improve the accuracy of inferences from large-scale public surveys by addressing both false negatives and false positives.
- To assess gray wolf (Canis lupus) occupancy dynamics in northern Montana from 2007-2010 using a novel statistical approach.
Main Methods:
- Derived estimators for dynamic occupancy parameters, incorporating a subset of reliably detected observations.
- Simultaneously modeled non-detection (false negatives) and misclassification (false positives) in presence-absence data.
- Utilized hunter survey data (deer and elk hunters) supplemented with locations of radio-collared wolves for analysis.
Main Results:
- Gray wolf occupancy in northern Montana remained relatively stable between 2007 and 2010.
- Wolves were primarily located in high-quality habitats within the study area.
- Site occupancy transitions (colonization/extinction) were infrequent; occupied sites generally remained occupied, and unoccupied sites remained unoccupied.
- Failure to account for false positives led to overestimation of both the area occupied by wolves and the rate of population turnover.
Conclusions:
- Accounting for both false negatives and false positives is essential for improving conservation inferences from public survey data.
- The proposed methodology enhances the understanding of species' status and population dynamics, particularly for species like gray wolves.
- This approach is broadly applicable to various data types susceptible to misclassification errors, improving ecological monitoring and conservation efforts.
Related Concept Videos
Conservation of Small Populations
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II
For binary data, runs are identified using symbols such as + and −, or equivalently, 1s and 0s. In...
What are Populations and Communities?
Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be approximately normally distributed. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. There is no specific requirement for sample size. But if the sample size is less than 30, and we don't know the population standard deviation, a different approach is used; instead...
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test I
The test works...
Threats to Biodiversity
