Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least squares (OLS)...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance, comparing...
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
Kaplan-Meier Approach01:24

Kaplan-Meier Approach

The Kaplan-Meier estimator is a non-parametric method used to estimate the survival function from time-to-event data. In medical research, it is frequently employed to measure the proportion of patients surviving for a certain period after treatment. This estimator is fundamental in analyzing time-to-event data, making it indispensable in clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and reliability engineering. By estimating survival probabilities, researchers can evaluate treatment effectiveness,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Towards a Unified Theory for Semiparametric Data Fusion with Individual-Level Data.

Annals of statistics·2026
Same author

Global Sensitivity Analysis for Studies Extending Inferences From a Randomized Trial to a Target Population.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

A Randomized Trial of Vitamin D Supplementation and COVID-19 Clinical Outcomes and Long COVID: The Vitamin D for COVID-19 Trial.

The Journal of nutrition·2026
Same author

Reinforcement Learning for Finding Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes Using Observational Data.

JAMA·2025
Same author

Immune Correlates and Vaccine Immunobridging: Statistical Innovations, Challenges, and Opportunities.

The Journal of infectious diseases·2025
Same author

Nonparametric identification is not enough, but randomized controlled trials are.

Observational studies·2025
Same journal

Individualized dynamic latent factor model for multi-resolutional data with application to mobile health.

Biometrika·2026
Same journal

Functional principal component analysis forsparse censored data.

Biometrika·2026
Same journal

Finding distributions that differ, with false discovery rate control.

Biometrika·2026
Same journal

Sequential Gibbs posteriors with applications to principal component analysis.

Biometrika·2026
Same journal

Comparing causal parameters with many treatments and positivity violations.

Biometrika·2026
Same journal

Leveraging External Data for Testing Experimental Therapies with Biomarker Interactions in Randomized Clinical Trials.

Biometrika·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 9, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

Improved double-robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models.

Andrea Rotnitzky1, Quanhong Lei, Mariela Sued

  • 1Di Tella University, Saenz Valiente 1010, Buenos Aires 14281, Argentina , arotnitzky@utdt.edu.

Biometrika
|July 12, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces novel double-robust estimators for regression models with incomplete data. These new methods offer improved efficiency and variance reduction compared to existing double-robust estimators.

Keywords:
Drop-outMarginal structural modelMissing at random

More Related Videos

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 9, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Econometrics
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Double-robust (DR) estimators are crucial for handling incomplete data in statistical modeling.
  • Existing DR estimators can suffer from low efficiency when outcome models are misspecified.
  • There is a need for more efficient DR estimators, particularly for regression and marginal structural mean models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To derive a new class of double-robust estimators for regression models with incomplete cross-sectional or longitudinal data.
  • To develop DR estimators for marginal structural mean models in cross-sectional data.
  • To enhance the efficiency of DR estimators under outcome model misspecification.

Main Methods:

  • Development of novel double-robust estimators that solve outcome regression estimating equations.
  • Application to regression models with incomplete cross-sectional or longitudinal data.
  • Extension to marginal structural mean models for cross-sectional data.

Main Results:

  • The new class of DR estimators demonstrates improved efficiency compared to standard DR estimators.
  • The proposed estimators maintain desirable double-robustness properties.
  • Simulation studies confirm variance improvements aligning with asymptotic theory.

Conclusions:

  • The newly derived double-robust estimators offer a more efficient alternative for analyzing incomplete data in regression settings.
  • These estimators provide a valuable tool for researchers dealing with missing data in various fields.
  • The findings suggest a significant advancement in the methodology for handling incomplete data robustly and efficiently.