Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2026

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface
Published on: May 8, 2021
FDR control with pseudo-gatekeeping based on a possibly data driven order of the hypotheses
1Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza-University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro, 5, 00185 Rome, Italy.
This study introduces a novel multiple testing procedure to control the false discovery rate (FDR). The method prioritizes hypotheses with larger effect sizes, enhancing the discovery of significant findings, especially in small sample sizes.
Area of Science:
- Statistics
- Bioinformatics
- Computational Biology
Background:
- Controlling the false discovery rate (FDR) is crucial in high-dimensional data analysis.
- Existing multiple testing procedures may lack power or require strong assumptions about data distribution.
- Identifying significant biological markers requires robust statistical methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a novel multiple testing procedure that controls the false discovery rate (FDR).
- To enhance the identification of biologically relevant hypotheses by prioritizing those with larger effect sizes.
- To ensure the procedure's validity under both independent and arbitrarily dependent test statistics.
Main Methods:
- A data-driven ordering of hypotheses based on effect size.
- Testing hypotheses sequentially at an uncorrected significance level (q) until a stopping rule is met.
- A modification to ensure validity under arbitrary dependence structures.
Main Results:
- The proposed procedure effectively controls the false discovery rate (FDR).
- The method demonstrates superior performance compared to existing procedures, particularly in small sample size scenarios.
- The procedure successfully identified molecular signatures in intracranial ependymoma data.
Conclusions:
- The developed multiple testing procedure offers a powerful and flexible approach for FDR control.
- Its data-driven ordering enhances the discovery of significant hypotheses, especially in challenging small sample settings.
- The associated R package (someMTP) provides accessible implementation for researchers.
Related Concept Videos
Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null hypothesis and 'fail to...
Types of Hypothesis Testing
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p ≠ 0.5.
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Null and Alternative Hypotheses
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the population that is...
Controls in Experiments
