Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Application of Nonlinear Inequalities

Application of Nonlinear Inequalities

A nonlinear inequality describes a comparison involving an expression that curves or behaves more complexly than a straight line. These inequalities often appear in forms that include squares, products, or variables in the denominator.To solve such an inequality, one starts by rewriting it so that zero appears on one side. For example, the inequality: can be factored as: This form makes it easier to identify the values that cause the expression to equal zero. In this case, the key values are 3...

Null and Alternative Hypotheses

Null and Alternative Hypotheses

The actual hypothesis testing begins by considering two hypotheses. They are termed the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. These hypotheses contain opposing viewpoints.
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the population that is...

Types of Hypothesis Testing

Types of Hypothesis Testing

There are three types of hypothesis tests: right-tailed, left-tailed, and two-tailed.
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p ≠ 0.5.

Bonferroni Test

Bonferroni Test

The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.

Behrens–Fisher Test

Behrens–Fisher Test

The Behrens-Fisher test is a statistical method designed to address the Behrens-Fisher problem, which arises when comparing the means of two normally distributed populations with unequal variances. Unlike the Student's t-test, which assumes equal variances, the Behrens-Fisher test allows for mean comparison without this restrictive assumption. This flexibility makes it particularly valuable in scenarios where two independent samples exhibit normality but lack variance homogeneity.
This test is...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Bounding the errors for convex dynamics on one or more polytopes.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2007

Same author

Introduction: pattern formation at the turn of the millennium.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2004

Same author

Convex dynamics: unavoidable difficulties in bounding some greedy algorithms.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2004

Same author

On the geometry of master-slave synchronization.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2003

Same author

Master-slave synchronization and the Lorenz equations.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2003

Same author

Piecewise linear models for the quasiperiodic transition to chaos.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·1996

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Bell inequality violations under reasonable and under weak hypotheses.

Edson de Faria¹, Charles Tresser

¹Instituto de Matemática e Estatística, USP, São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-090, Brazil. edson@ime.usp.br

Physical Review Letters

|July 16, 2013

Summary

Quantum mechanics and classical microscopic realism predict correlations that violate Bell

Area of Science:

Quantum mechanics
Quantum information
Foundations of physics

Background:

Quantum mechanics describes particle spin correlations using probabilities.
Classical microscopic realism (CMR) posits underlying definite properties.
Bell's theorem explores inequalities derived from CMR and locality.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate violations of Bell-type inequalities under specific quantum mechanical assumptions.
To explore the conditions under which quantum correlations deviate from classical predictions.
To identify scenarios where quantum mechanics and CMR lead to conflicting predictions.

Main Methods:

Analyzing spin-1/2 particle pair correlations in the singlet state.
Evaluating quantum mechanical correlations = -cos(θa-θb).

Related Experiment Videos

Comparing quantum predictions with inequalities derived from classical microscopic realism and locality.

Main Results:

Identified specific quadruplets of measurement settings (Q) where inequalities are violated.
Demonstrated that violations occur even with mild assumptions beyond quantum mechanics and CMR.
Showcased scenarios where quantum mechanics predicts outcomes inconsistent with classical realism.

Conclusions:

Quantum mechanics and classical microscopic realism yield incompatible predictions for certain spin correlation measurements.
Bell-type inequalities can be violated under conditions relying solely on quantum mechanics and CMR with minimal additional hypotheses.
The study highlights the fundamental differences between quantum and classical descriptions of reality.