Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2026

Testing the Efficacy of Pharmacological Agents in a Pericardial Target Delivery Model in the Swine
Published on: July 7, 2016
Focus on right ventricular outflow tract septal pacing
Antoine Da Costa1, Laurent Gabriel, Cécile Romeyer-Bouchard
1Service de Cardiologie, Université Jean Monnet, Hôpital Nord, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Etienne, France. dakosta@aol.com
Insights
Right ventricular apical pacing can harm left ventricular function over time. Alternative septal pacing methods show limited benefits, but ongoing studies aim to clarify their long-term efficacy and patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Cardiac Pacing
Background:
- Right ventricular apical pacing (RVAP) is linked to adverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling and desynchronization.
- This risk is elevated in patients with moderate LV dysfunction, manifesting after prolonged pacing.
- RVAP can contribute to organic mitral insufficiency, prompting research into alternative pacing sites.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the long-term effects of RVAP on LV remodeling and function.
- To compare the clinical outcomes of RVAP with alternative pacing strategies like right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) septal pacing.
- To identify potential benefits of infundibular septal pacing over RVAP.
Main Methods:
- Review of experimental and clinical studies on RVAP and alternative pacing.
- Analysis of prospective randomized studies and meta-analyses comparing RVAP and RVOT septal pacing.
- Consideration of ongoing multicenter randomized trials assessing infundibular septal pacing.
Main Results:
- RVAP can lead to significant LV desynchronization and remodeling, particularly after one year.
- Current studies show modest medium-term effects of RVOT septal pacing on ejection fraction, with no significant impact on quality of life or survival.
- Previous comparative studies may lack sufficient statistical power and homogeneity.
Conclusions:
- RVAP poses long-term risks to LV function and remodeling.
- Current evidence for RVOT septal pacing offers limited clinical advantages over RVAP.
- Further robust research, including ongoing trials, is necessary to definitively assess infundibular septal pacing's efficacy and patient prognosis.
Abstract:
Experimental and clinical studies have shown that right ventricular apical pacing may result in long-term deleterious effects on account of its negative impact on left ventricular remodeling through desynchronization. This risk appears more pronounced in patients with even moderate left ventricular dysfunction and generally occurs after at least 1 year of pacing. As right ventricular apical pacing may be associated with the development of organic mitral insufficiency, other sites that allow for more physiological stimulation, such as right ventricular outflow tract septal pacing, have been developed, with good feasibility and reproducibility. However, the prospective randomized studies and meta-analyses to date have only demonstrated a modest effect on ejection fraction in the medium term, without any significant effect on quality of life and morbimortality. However, the absence of a favorable effect for right ventricular outflow tract septal pacing compared with right ventricular apical pacing in terms of clinical manifestations and patient prognosis appears to be more associated with the designs of these studies, which were not homogeneous with regard to methodology used, judgment criteria, follow-up and, especially, statistical power. Two randomized prospective multicentre studies are currently ongoing in order to evaluate the favorable effect of infundibular septal pacing, when considering the indirect negative effects of right ventricular apical pacing as reported in the literature.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management

