Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2026

Setup and Execution Of the Blindfolded Code Training Exercise
Published on: March 29, 2019
Pediatric trauma team activation: are we making the right call?
York Tien Lee1, Xun Yi Jasmine Feng1, Yea-Chyi Lin1
1Department of Paediatric Surgery, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.
Insights
The Pediatric Trauma Score (PTS), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), and respiratory rate (RR) showed poor reliability in identifying major pediatric trauma and guiding resuscitation in Singapore. Refinements are needed to improve accuracy and reduce undertriage.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Emergency Medicine
- Trauma System Evaluation
- Clinical Scoring Systems
Background:
- Regionalized trauma systems require tailoring to local epidemiology and resources.
- Singapore's compact geography and low severe trauma incidence present unique pediatric trauma system challenges.
- A reliable screening system is crucial for identifying children needing urgent transport and trauma team activation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the validity of the Pediatric Trauma Score (PTS), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), and respiratory rate (RR) in identifying pediatric patients with major trauma.
- To assess the reliability of PTS, GCS, and RR in predicting the need for emergency department (ED) resuscitation.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of trauma registry data from January 2011 to December 2012.
- Inclusion of 92 pediatric patients, analyzing demographics, injury mechanisms, resuscitation, and outcomes.
- Calculation of sensitivity and specificity for PTS, GCS, and RR in predicting major trauma and ED resuscitation.
Main Results:
- Of 92 patients, 26 had major trauma and 21 received ED resuscitation.
- Sensitivity and specificity for predicting major trauma: PTS ≤ 8 (61.5%, 77.3%), GCS ≤ 10 (26.9%, 100%), abnormal RR (53.8%, 60.6%).
- Sensitivity and specificity for predicting ED resuscitation: PTS ≤ 8 (90.5%, 83.1%), GCS ≤ 10 (28.6%, 98.6%), abnormal RR (76.2%, 66.2%).
Conclusions:
- The current parameters of the Pediatric Trauma Score (PTS) require refinement to enhance accuracy and minimize undertriage.
- The study indicated poor reliability of PTS, GCS, and RR in predicting pediatric major trauma.
- Combined scoring systems like PTS may render other physiologic parameters such as GCS and RR redundant if not properly validated.
Introduction:
A regionalized trauma system must be tailored to the trauma epidemiology and the trauma care resources of the population it serves. Pediatric trauma system in Singapore differs from others because of its geographic compactness and relatively low incidence of severe trauma. The scarcity of polytrauma highlights the need of a reliable screening system to identify injured children who necessitate urgent transport to emergency department (ED) with pediatric resuscitation capacity as well as activation of trauma team upon their arrival. In this study, the validity of Pediatric Trauma Score (PTS), Glasgow Come Scale (GCS), and respiratory rate (RR) in identifying pediatric patients with major trauma and receipt of resuscitation is evaluated.
Patients And Methods:
After obtaining Institutional Review Board approval, a retrospective analysis was performed using data obtained from our trauma registry between January 2011 and December 2012. Information pertaining to the demographics, causative mechanism, and injury description, resuscitation, admitting disciplines, surgical intervention, and outcome were analyzed. The sensitivity and specificity of PTS, GCS, and RR to predict outcomes of interest are calculated.
Results:
A total of 92 patients were recruited. From the 92 patients, 26 sustained major trauma, and 21 patients received ED resuscitation. The mean age was 4 years 9 months. Sensitivity and specificity of PTS ≤ 8, GCS ≤ 10, and abnormal RR for predicting major trauma were 61.5, 77.3; 26.9, 100; and 53.8, 60.6%; respectively. When the reliability to identify patients received ED resuscitation was evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of PTS ≤ 8, GCS ≤ 10, and abnormal RR were 90.5, 83.1; 28.6, 98.6; and 76.2, 66.2%; respectively.
Conclusion:
The parameters of PTS need to be further refined to improve its accuracy and minimize the undertriage rate. If a combined physiologic and anatomic scoring system such as PTS is used, other physiologic parameters such as GCS and RR may become redundant. The evaluation of the validity of PTS, GCS, and RR in predicting pediatric major trauma indicated poor reliability.
More Related Videos
11:27A Modified Sonographic Algorithm for Image Acquisition in Life-Threatening Emergencies in the Critically Ill Newborn
Published on: April 7, 2023
09:52Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
Published on: January 15, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Traumatic Brain Injury l: Introduction