Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Observational Studies01:11

Observational Studies

Observational studies are a type of analytical study where researchers observe events without any interventions. In other words, the researcher does not influence the response variable or the experiment's outcome.
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One example of...
Surveys02:16

Surveys

Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
Stratified Sampling Method01:16

Stratified Sampling Method

Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...
Sample Proportion and Population Proportion01:20

Sample Proportion and Population Proportion

Collecting samples or responses from an entire population takes significant time and effort, so a researcher collects responses from only a sample of that population. Suppose a study needs to collect information about a specific mobile application. After sample collection, the researcher analyzes the data and discovers that most individuals in the sample use that specific mobile application. The sample proportion measures the number of individuals in a sample who either use or don't use the...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Data Collection by Observations01:08

Data Collection by Observations

Data collection refers to a systematic way of obtaining, observing, measuring, and analyzing accurate information. Observational studies are one of the most widely used methods of data collection. It involves collecting data by observing the behavior and physical characteristics of a sample without making any modifications to the sample.
An astronomer viewing the motion and brightness of stars in the sky and recording the data is an example of observational data collection. A botanist recording...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Longitudinal association of switching to dual cigarette and e-cigarette use vs. continued exclusive cigarette smoking with tobacco-specific nitrosamine and nicotine intake.

Addiction (Abingdon, England)·2026
Same author

CACE-MM: using mixed methods to strengthen causal inference in medicine and public health.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same author

Large language models for full-text methods assessment: a case study on mediation analysis.

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA·2026
Same author

A <i>Cautionary Tale</i> on Integrating Studies with Disparate Outcome Measures for Causal Inference.

Advances in neural information processing systems·2026
Same author

Comparative effectiveness of antidepressants for depression using EHRs from two health systems.

BMC psychiatry·2026
Same author

The TARGET guideline for reporting observational studies of interventions.

Nature medicine·2026
Same journal

Engaging Families in Pediatric Care Management: A Qualitative Study From the North Carolina Integrated Care for Kids Model.

Health services research·2026
Same journal

The Effect of Hospital-Physician Vertical Integration on Utilization-Driven Changes in Healthcare Spending for an All-Payer Population With Multiple Chronic Conditions.

Health services research·2026
Same journal

The Association Between Sepsis Coding and Payment to U.S. Hospitals.

Health services research·2026
Same journal

Stagnation in Achieving Recommended Methadone Doses in Opioid Use Disorder Treatment.

Health services research·2026
Same journal

Promoting Transplant Access Through Dialysis Facility Performance Metrics: A Double-Edged Sword.

Health services research·2026
Same journal

Understanding Medicaid Estate Recovery: The Experience of North Carolina and Policy Implications for Future Reforms.

Health services research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 9, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Generalizing observational study results: applying propensity score methods to complex surveys.

Eva H Dugoff1, Megan Schuler, Elizabeth A Stuart

  • 1Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N. Broadway, Rm 301, Baltimore, MD, 21205.

Health Services Research
|July 17, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Combining propensity score methods with survey weighting is crucial for accurate treatment effect estimates in complex survey data. This approach ensures results are unbiased and generalizable to the target population.

Keywords:
Survey researchhealth care costsprimary care

More Related Videos

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 9, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Observational studies often face confounding, necessitating methods to estimate treatment effects accurately.
  • Complex survey data present unique challenges due to sampling weights and design.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a tutorial on applying propensity score methods to complex survey data.
  • To compare different propensity score methods and survey weighting strategies for estimating treatment effects.

Main Methods:

  • Simulation studies and analysis of the 2008 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data.
  • Comparison of naive estimates, survey weighting, propensity score methods (matching, weighting, subclassification), and combined approaches.
  • Evaluation based on bias and confidence interval coverage.

Main Results:

  • Combining propensity score methods with survey weighting is essential for unbiased and generalizable treatment effect estimates.
  • Ignoring survey weights can lead to results not representative of the survey target population.

Conclusions:

  • Propensity score methods are vital for managing confounding in observational research.
  • Appropriate use of survey weights alongside propensity scores is key for valid inferences.
  • Guidelines are provided for selecting propensity score methods based on research objectives.