Professional kinesiology practice for chronic low back pain: single-blind, randomised controlled pilot study.
1Complementary and Integrative Medicine Research, Primary Medical Care, University of Southampton, UK. s.eardley@soton.ac.uk
Summary
Professional Kinesiology Practice (PKP) showed a moderate specific effect for chronic low back pain compared to sham treatments. Both real and sham PKP significantly improved pain and disability more than a waiting list control.
Area of Science:
- Complementary and Alternative Medicine
- Musculoskeletal Health
- Pain Management
Background:
- Chronic low back pain is a prevalent condition lacking definitive treatments.
- Professional Kinesiology Practice (PKP) is an under-researched complementary therapy utilizing non-standard muscle testing.
- No prior studies have evaluated the effectiveness of PKP.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a pilot study assessing the effectiveness of PKP for chronic low back pain.
- To compare real PKP against sham PKP and a waiting list control (WLC).
Main Methods:
- An exploratory, pragmatic, single-blind, 3-arm randomized sham-controlled pilot study.
- 70 participants with chronic low back pain (RMDQ score ≥4) were randomized to real PKP, sham PKP, or WLC.
- Treatments involved 1 session weekly for 5 weeks; WLC participants were later re-randomized.
Main Results:
- Real PKP demonstrated a moderate specific effect compared to sham (mean RMDQ difference -2.9, p=0.04).
- Both real and sham PKP showed significant improvements in RMDQ scores compared to WLC (effect sizes 2.1 and 1.4, respectively).
- Holistic health beliefs (CAMBI) predicted outcomes, while practitioner empathy (CARE) and patient enablement (PEI) did not.
Conclusions:
- PKP exhibits a moderate specific treatment effect for chronic low back pain.
- Substantial non-specific and contextual effects were observed for both real and sham PKP.
- Further definitive research, including qualitative components, is warranted to elucidate PKP's mechanisms.

