Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2026

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
Factors influencing decision making on therapeutic interventions
Sang Moo Lee1, Gaeun Kim, Jeonghoon Ahn
1National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaboration Agency, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Key factors influencing health technology assessment decisions in Korea include safety, efficacy, and comparative effectiveness. Positive influences involve lower complications and expanded patient choice, while negative factors include limited evidence and unclear mechanisms.
Area of Science:
- Health Technology Assessment
- Health Policy
- Decision Analysis
Background:
- The assessment of new health technologies is crucial for healthcare systems.
- Understanding decision-making factors in health technology assessment (HTA) is vital for policy development.
- The Committee for New Health Technology Assessment (CnHTA) in Korea plays a key role in evaluating new technologies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore factors influencing decision-making in the assessment of new health technologies in Korea.
- To identify criteria used by the CnHTA in evaluating new nondrug health technologies.
- To provide insights into the values considered by HTA decision-makers regarding safety and effectiveness.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative analysis of decision-making results from the CnHTA.
- Inclusion of 53 new nondrug health technologies assessed between July 2007 and December 2010.
- Focus on therapeutic interventions, excluding diagnostic procedures, with decisions based on systematic literature reviews.
Main Results:
- Positive decision factors: lower complication rates, similar/greater effectiveness, organ preservation, no alternatives, decreased invasiveness, expanded patient choice, similar mechanism.
- Negative decision factors: higher complication rates, lower effectiveness, low evidence, unknown mechanisms, inconsistency, lack of long-term/comparative data, nonstandardization, heterogeneity, diverse indications, non-generalizability.
- Decisions were primarily based on safety and efficacy/effectiveness, considering a multidisciplinary committee composition.
Conclusions:
- Past decision-making data offers insights into the values guiding HTA in Korea.
- Findings can inform the development of appraisal guidelines for new health technologies.
- Enhancing the objectivity of decision-making processes in Korean HTA is a key outcome.
Related Concept Videos
Elements Crucial for Effective Psychotherapy
The Therapeutic Alliance
The therapeutic alliance refers to the relationship between the therapist and the client. The alliance strengthens when the therapist and the client engage in a nurturing, supportive, trusting, empathetic, and respectful relationship, improving therapeutic outcomes. Therapists must monitor this relationship...
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Affecting Factors
Factors Affecting Drug Response: Overview
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions
Biopharmaceutical Factors Influencing Drug Product Design: Overview
Drug Toxicity: Risk factors
