Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2026

MRI and PET in Mouse Models of Myocardial Infarction
Published on: December 19, 2013
Quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging by cardiovascular magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography
K Bratis1, I Mahmoud, A Chiribiri
1Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, 4th Floor, Lambeth Wing, St. Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, United Kingdom, konstantinos.bratis@kcl.ac.uk.
Insights
Quantifying myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) using non-invasive stress imaging, like positron emission tomography (PET) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), helps assess coronary artery disease (CAD) risk. This review compares PET and CMR for accurate MPR quantification.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Imaging
- Nuclear Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Background:
- Clinical management of coronary artery disease (CAD) increasingly focuses on identifying myocardial ischemia and quantifying ischemic burden, rather than solely relying on angiographic extent.
- Non-invasive stress imaging techniques are preferred for assessing ischemia and guiding clinical decisions in patients with CAD.
- Quantitative assessment of regional myocardial perfusion provides objective estimates of myocardial injury and infarction risk.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the evidence for using Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) in quantifying myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR).
- To highlight studies that directly compare the diagnostic performance of PET and CMR for MPR quantification.
- To emphasize the role of MPR in assessing myocardial ischemia and guiding patient management.
Main Methods:
- Review of current literature on PET and CMR for myocardial blood flow (MBF) and MPR quantification.
- Focus on studies comparing PET and CMR methodologies for MPR assessment.
- Inclusion of data on diagnostic performance and prognostic value of both imaging modalities.
Main Results:
- PET is established as the reference standard for quantitative MBF and MPR.
- CMR is increasingly utilized for MBF and MPR measurement using first-pass signals, demonstrating significant diagnostic performance and prognostic value.
- Direct comparative studies between PET and CMR for MPR quantification are crucial for understanding their relative strengths.
Conclusions:
- Non-invasive quantitative assessment of MPR using PET and CMR is vital for managing patients with CAD.
- Both PET and CMR offer valuable insights into myocardial ischemia, aiding in risk stratification and clinical decision-making.
- Further direct comparative studies are needed to fully elucidate the complementary roles and differences between PET and CMR in MPR quantification.
Abstract:
Recent studies have demonstrated that a detailed knowledge of the extent of angiographic coronary artery disease (CAD) is not a prerequisite for clinical decision making, and the clinical management of patients with CAD is more and more focused towards the identification of myocardial ischemia and the quantification of ischemic burden. In this view, non-invasive assessment of ischemia and in particular stress imaging techniques are emerging as preferred and non-invasive options. A quantitative assessment of regional myocardial perfusion can provide an objective estimate of the severity of myocardial injury and may help clinicians to discriminate regions of the heart that are at increased risk for myocardial infarction. Positron emission tomography (PET) has established itself as the reference standard for myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) quantification. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is increasingly used to measure MBF and MPR by means of first-pass signals, with a well-defined diagnostic performance and prognostic value. The aim of this article is to review the currently available evidence on the use of both PET and CMR for quantification of MPR, with particular attention to the studies that directly compared these two diagnostic methods.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Positron Emission Tomography
One of the main requirements of a PET scan is a positron-emitting radioisotope, which is produced in a cyclotron and then attached to a substance used by the part of the body being...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy
Fundamental Principles of PET
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ventilation Perfusion Scans are two radiological investigations that offer detailed diagnostic images of the body, particularly lung structures.
MRI
MRI uses magnetic fields and radiofrequency signals to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. This technology provides a more detailed diagnostic image than CT scans, enabling it to characterize pulmonary nodules, stage bronchogenic carcinoma, and evaluate inflammatory activity in...

