Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cancer Prevention02:59

Cancer Prevention

Several factors can increase the risk of cancer in an individual. About 50% of cancer cases can be prevented by adopting a healthy lifestyle, regular exercise, eating healthy, and following a modest cancer prevention diet. Epidemiological studies have consistently shown that populations with vegetable and fruit-rich diets have reduced the incidence of cancer. On the other hand, populations who have a diet rich in animal fat, red meat, junk food, or high calories are predisposed to cancer.
Some...
Cancer Prevention02:59

Cancer Prevention

Several factors can increase the risk of cancer in an individual. About 50% of cancer cases can be prevented by adopting a healthy lifestyle, regular exercise, eating healthy, and following a modest cancer prevention diet. Epidemiological studies have consistently shown that populations with vegetable and fruit-rich diets have reduced the incidence of cancer. On the other hand, populations who have a diet rich in animal fat, red meat, junk food, or high calories are predisposed to cancer.
Some...
Principles of Disease Surveillance01:26

Principles of Disease Surveillance

Disease surveillance is the systematic collection, analysis, and interpretation of health data essential to the planning, implementation, and evaluation of public health practice. This process integrates data dissemination to entities responsible for preventing and controlling disease, injury, and disability. Surveillance systems provide crucial information for action, helping public health authorities make informed decisions to manage and prevent outbreaks, ensure public safety, optimize...
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II01:18

Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II

The person's health status fluctuates continually, varying from being in good health to becoming ill and returning to being healthy. To understand the concept of illness prevention, there are two models. First, the health-illness continuum model is a graphic representation of an individual's wellness. It states that a person is considered healthy in the absence of physical disease and the presence of good emotional health.
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results from...
Nursing Implementation01:15

Nursing Implementation

Implementation is the execution of the nursing care plan developed during the planning phase.
The five steps to implementing effective nursing care include reassessing the patient, reviewing and revising the existing nursing care plan, organizing the resources and care delivery, anticipating and preventing complications, and implementing nursing interventions.
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention I01:25

Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention I

A model is a theoretical way to understand a concept or an idea. Models can overcome barriers to health regardless of diverse economic and cultural backgrounds. In addition, models make the task easier by providing different ways to approach complex issues. There are two major health promotion models: the health belief model and the health promotion model.
The health belief model (HBM) attempts to predict health-related behavior in specific belief patterns. According to the HBM, a person's...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Scaling what works: a collaborative capacity-building program tailored to optimize resources and scale evidence-based interventions for cancer prevention and control.

Cancer causes & control : CCC·2026
Same author

Characterizing screening champions in the center for disease control and prevention's Colorectal Cancer Control Program (CRCCP).

Implementation science communications·2025
Same author

Public Understanding of and Engagement With Community Health Workers and Promotores de Salud: Findings From Two National Surveys.

Preventing chronic disease·2025
Same author

Sustainability of evidence based interventions implemented in CDC's colorectal cancer control program.

Implementation science communications·2025
Same author

Estimating the long-term health impact and program cost-effectiveness of providing direct screening services to low-income, medically underserved patients through the Colorectal Cancer Control Program (CRCCP).

Cancer causes & control : CCC·2025
Same author

Building healthcare-community partnerships: process evaluation of a coalition approach to addressing cancer survivors' health-related social needs.

BMC health services research·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 9, 2026

E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

Implementing the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program: wisdom from the field.

Elizabeth A Rohan1, Jennifer E Boehm, Amy DeGroff

  • 1Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. erohan@cdc.gov

Cancer
|July 23, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Implementing colorectal cancer screening programs requires addressing clinical complexity and social norms. Strategies like patient navigation and local adaptation are key to successful public health interventions for this common cancer.

Keywords:
cancer screening testscollaborationcolorectal cancer screeningearly detection of cancerinterdisciplinary communicationprogram evaluationprogram implementationqualitative evaluationtaboo

More Related Videos

Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Risk and Prevalence by Stool DNA Integrity Detection
07:35

Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Risk and Prevalence by Stool DNA Integrity Detection

Published on: June 8, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 9, 2026

E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Risk and Prevalence by Stool DNA Integrity Detection
07:35

Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Risk and Prevalence by Stool DNA Integrity Detection

Published on: June 8, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Cancer Prevention
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer death in the US, necessitating effective public health interventions.
  • Organized screening programs are crucial for early detection and prevention but are under-implemented and unevaluated.
  • The Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program (CRCSDP) aimed to increase screening in underserved populations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the implementation processes of the Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program (CRCSDP).
  • To identify facilitators and barriers to colorectal cancer screening program implementation in diverse settings.

Main Methods:

  • A longitudinal, multiple case study design was employed.
  • Qualitative data collection included 100 stakeholder interviews, 125 observations, and 19 document reviews.
  • Data analysis involved within-case and cross-case examination of implementation themes.

Main Results:

  • Key implementation themes included the complexity of screening, the importance of teamwork and collaboration, and program integration into existing systems.
  • Local adaptation and the influence of social norms were significant factors in program success.
  • Interactions between these themes influenced overall implementation outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • Clinical complexity and public acceptance challenges impact colorectal cancer screening program implementation.
  • Strategies such as patient navigation, transdisciplinary teamwork, and leveraging local expertise enhance program delivery.
  • Public health initiatives must actively address and counteract negative social norms associated with colorectal cancer screening.