Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2026
08:53
Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke
Published on: June 6, 2025
Microswitch-aided programs with contingent stimulation versus general stimulation programs for post-coma persons with
Giulio E Lancioni1, Nirbhay N Singh, Mark F O'Reilly
1Department of Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Bari , Bari , Italy .
Developmental Neurorehabilitation
|July 23, 2013
Summary
Microswitch programs with contingent stimulation improved response engagement and alertness in post-coma individuals. These findings suggest contingent stimulation is more beneficial for participants with multiple disabilities.
Area of Science:
- Neurorehabilitation
- Assistive Technology
Background:
- Individuals with severe brain injuries often experience profound disabilities.
- Assessing engagement and alertness is crucial for rehabilitation progress.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate microswitch-aided programs with contingent stimulation.
- To measure response engagement and post-session alertness in post-coma participants.
Main Methods:
- Two studies involved post-coma participants with multiple disabilities.
- Participants received contingent and non-contingent stimulation via microswitch-aided programs.
- Response engagement (Study I) and alertness (Study II) were measured using the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R).
Main Results:
- Study I: Increased response engagement occurred only during contingent stimulation.
- Study II: Participants showed higher alertness after contingent stimulation sessions compared to non-contingent ones.
Conclusions:
- Microswitch-aided programs with contingent stimulation offer greater benefits.
- Contingent stimulation positively impacts engagement and alertness in this population.
