Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Higher Mental Functions of the Brain: Language01:10

Higher Mental Functions of the Brain: Language

Language is a system of communication that allows the expression of thoughts, ideas, and feelings. The brain processes language in both hemispheres.
Language formation and comprehension take place in the dominant hemisphere. The dominant hemisphere is responsible for understanding the meaning of spoken, written, or sign language, as well as the ability to communicate. For most people, the left hemisphere is the dominant one. The right hemisphere, then, gives tone and emotional context to the...
Language and Cognition01:27

Language and Cognition

Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.
Encoding01:19

Encoding

Information enters the brain through encoding, which is the input of information into the memory system. Once sensory information is received from the environment, the brain labels or codes it. The information is then organized with similar information and connected to existing concepts. Encoding occurs through automatic processing and effortful processing.
Automatic processing involves the encoding of details like time, space, frequency, and the meaning of words, usually done without conscious...
Components of Language01:24

Components of Language

Language, whether spoken, signed, or written, consists of specific components: lexicon and grammar. The lexicon is the vocabulary of a language, comprising its words. Grammar is the set of rules used to convey meaning through the lexicon. For example, English grammar adds “-ed” to most verbs to indicate past tense. Words are formed by combining phonemes, which are the basic sound units of a language. Different languages have different sets of phonemes (e.g., “ah” vs. “eh”). Phonemes combine to...
Storage01:23

Storage

A schema is a mental framework that helps individuals organize and interpret information. Schemata, formed from previous experiences, influence how we process new information: how we encode it, the inferences we make, and how we retrieve it. For instance, a schema for what a typical classroom looks like might include desks, a teacher's desk, a whiteboard, and students in such an environment. This expectation helps us quickly understand and navigate new classrooms without needing to analyze each...
Introduction to Cognitive Psychology01:20

Introduction to Cognitive Psychology

Cognitive psychology is the field of psychology dedicated to examining how people think. It attempts to explain how and why we think the way we do by studying the interactions among human thinking, emotion, creativity, language, and problem-solving, as well as other cognitive processes. Cognitive psychology studies how information is processed and manipulated in remembering, thinking, and knowing.
This field emerged in the mid-20th century, following a period dominated by behaviorism, which...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Supramodal Sentence Processing in the Human Brain: fMRI Evidence for the Influence of Syntactic Complexity in More Than 200 Participants.

Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)·2023
Same author

Syntactic priming and the lexical boost effect during sentence production and sentence comprehension: an fMRI study.

Brain and language·2013
Same author

The Unification Space implemented as a localist neural net: predictions and error-tolerance in a constraint-based parser.

Cognitive neurodynamics·2009
Same author

Retrieval and unification of syntactic structure in sentence comprehension: an FMRI study using word-category ambiguity.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2008
Same author

In defense of competition during syntactic ambiguity resolution.

Journal of psycholinguistic research·2008
Same author

An artificial opposition between grammaticality and frequency: comment on Bornkessel, Schlesewsky, and Friederici (2002).

Cognition·2003

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 9, 2026

Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks
11:18

Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks

Published on: March 2, 2015

Prolegomena to a neurocomputational architecture for human grammatical encoding and decoding.

Gerard Kempen1

  • 1Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, PO Box 310, 6500 AH, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, gerard.kempen@mpi.nl.

Neuroinformatics
|July 23, 2013
PubMed
Summary

This study presents a neurocomputational model for language processing, demonstrating how fixed neural networks can form complex syntactic structures for both understanding and producing language. The architecture supports both grammatical encoding and decoding using prewired circuitry.

More Related Videos

Decoding Natural Behavior from Neuroethological Embedding
08:00

Decoding Natural Behavior from Neuroethological Embedding

Published on: October 3, 2025

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning
05:33

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning

Published on: January 29, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 9, 2026

Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks
11:18

Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks

Published on: March 2, 2015

Decoding Natural Behavior from Neuroethological Embedding
08:00

Decoding Natural Behavior from Neuroethological Embedding

Published on: October 3, 2025

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning
05:33

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning

Published on: January 29, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Computational Linguistics
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • Syntactic structure formation in language production and comprehension remains a complex challenge for neurocomputational models.
  • Existing models often struggle to explain how complex grammars are processed within fixed neural architectures.
  • Evidence suggests overlap between neural mechanisms for grammatical encoding and decoding, hinting at a unified system.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a neurocomputational architecture for grammatical processing in both language production (encoding) and comprehension (decoding).
  • To investigate how complex syntactic structures can be formed in a fixed neural network without online connection changes.
  • To determine if a single neural infrastructure can support both grammatical encoding and decoding.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a neurocomputational architecture based on the "Unification Space" model.
  • The architecture relies on prewired circuitry, with referential processing utilizing the hippocampal complex.
  • Inclusion of a mechanism to handle grammatical movement phenomena.

Main Results:

  • The proposed architecture enables online syntactic structure formation within a fixed neural network.
  • The model successfully integrates grammatical encoding and decoding onto a shared neural infrastructure.
  • A mechanism for processing grammatical movement phenomena is incorporated.

Conclusions:

  • A unified neurocomputational architecture can account for syntactic structure formation in both language production and comprehension.
  • The model demonstrates the feasibility of complex grammatical processing using prewired neural circuitry.
  • This framework supports the hypothesis of a single "grammatical coder" underlying language processing.