Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Swallowed button batteries: is there a consensus on management?

J G Studley1, I P Linehan, A L Ogilvie

  • 1Gastric Clinic, Northampton General Hospital.

Gut
|August 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Treatment of psoriatic arthritis with antitumour necrosis factor-alpha antibody clears skin lesions of psoriasis resistant to treatment with methotrexate.

The British journal of dermatology·2001
Same author

Immature dendritic cells generated with low doses of GM-CSF in the absence of IL-4 are maturation resistant and prolong allograft survival in vivo.

European journal of immunology·2000
Same author

The patient with anal problems.

The Practitioner·2000
Same author

Human monocyte derived dendritic cells express functional P2X and P2Y receptors as well as ecto-nucleotidases.

FEBS letters·1999
Same author

Audit of methods of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

The British journal of surgery·1999
Same author

An advanced culture method for generating large quantities of highly pure dendritic cells from mouse bone marrow.

Journal of immunological methods·1999
Same journal

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with type 2 diabetes: a target trial emulation study.

Gut·2026
Same journal

Dysregulated sphingolipid metabolismdrives pancreatic carcinogenesis through plasma membrane Kras enrichment.

Gut·2026
Same journal

USP20 promotes CD8<sup>+</sup> T cell exhaustion and impairs KRAS<sup>G12D</sup> inhibitor efficacy by orchestrating cholesterol metabolism and autophagy in pancreatic cancer.

Gut·2026
Same journal

CTCF-rs705704-SUOX axis is important for the association between hypothyroidism and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.

Gut·2026
Same journal

<i>Helicobacter pylori</i> infection, treatment and colorectal cancer risk by genetic predisposition: evidence from two randomised trials.

Gut·2026
Same journal

Correction: Sodium+/taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide as target therapy for liver fibrosis.

Gut·2026
See all related articles

Management of ingested button batteries varies significantly among gastroenterologists. Many physicians are uncertain how to treat button battery ingestion, leading to inconsistent practices and potential risks like heavy metal poisoning.

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Pediatric Medicine
  • Toxicology

Background:

  • Ingested button batteries pose a significant risk, particularly in children.
  • Current management strategies for button battery ingestion are not standardized.
  • Potential for heavy metal poisoning from ingested batteries is a growing concern.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To ascertain the optimum management of ingested button batteries.
  • To evaluate current practices among British Society of Gastroenterology members.
  • To identify variations in treatment approaches for button battery ingestion.

Main Methods:

  • A postal questionnaire was distributed to members of the endoscopic and pediatric sections of the British Society of Gastroenterology.
  • 312 responses were analyzed to assess management practices.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Data collected included physician concerns, treatment methods, and removal circumstances.

    • Main Results:

    • A significant percentage of respondents (36.2%) expressed no concern and provided no treatment for ingested button batteries.
    • Medical treatments (e.g., emetics, antacids, laxatives) were commonly used, but inconsistently.
    • 48.4% of respondents removed batteries under specific circumstances, with varying timelines for esophageal, gastric, and duodenal impactions.

    Conclusions:

    • Current management of ingested button batteries is highly variable and often inconsistent.
    • A notable proportion of physicians lack a clear management protocol.
    • There is a potential for underestimation of heavy metal poisoning associated with button battery ingestion.