Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
Published on: July 22, 2025
"Reasonable suspicion" about tough immigration legislation: enforcing laws or ethnocentric exclusion?
Sahana Mukherjee1, Ludwin E Molina, Glenn Adams
1Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA. sahana@ku.edu
Abstract:
We examined whether support for tough immigration legislation reflects identity-neutral enforcement of law or identity-relevant defense of privilege. Participants read a fabricated news story in which law-enforcement personnel detained a person due to "reasonable suspicion" that he was an undocumented immigrant. We manipulated descriptions of the detainee so that he was either (a) an undocumented immigrant (both studies), (b) a documented immigrant (Study 1), or (c) a U.S. citizen (Study 2) of either Mexican or Canadian origin. Participants in both studies endorsed tougher punishment of an undocumented detainee and rated tough treatment as more fair when the detainee was of Mexican than Canadian origin (regardless of documentation status). Across both studies, the patterns of ethnocentric exclusion-harsher treatment toward Mexican immigrants than Canadian immigrants-were particularly pronounced among participants who defined American identity in terms of assimilation to Anglocentric cultural values (e.g., being able to speak English). Overall, results suggest that people may support tough measures to restrict immigration to defend against symbolic threats-especially threats that cultural "others" pose to Anglocentric understandings of American identity.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Surveys
Stereotype Content Model
Standards of Care I
In- and Out-Groups
Self Within Cultural Contexts

