Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 9, 2026

Lung CT Segmentation to Identify Consolidations and Ground Glass Areas for Quantitative Assesment of SARS-CoV Pneumonia
08:05

Lung CT Segmentation to Identify Consolidations and Ground Glass Areas for Quantitative Assesment of SARS-CoV Pneumonia

Published on: December 19, 2020

Local noise estimation in low-dose chest CT images.

J Padgett1, A M Biancardi, C I Henschke

  • 1School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA, jjp263@cornell.edu.

International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
|July 24, 2013
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a new automated method to measure image noise in low-dose chest CT scans. Because noise levels change based on tissue type and scanner settings, standard global measurements are often inaccurate. The researchers created a technique that identifies uniform tissue areas, calculates noise locally, and fills in gaps for complex regions. This approach helps improve image quality monitoring and enhances the accuracy of automated fat tissue identification. Testing on phantom models and patient scans confirmed that the method effectively captures significant noise variations.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Global advances and future directions in lung cancer care: expert consensus and strategic priorities.

ESMO open·2026
Same author

Predicted Effect of Incidental Pulmonary Nodule Findings on NSCLC Mortality.

Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer·2024
Same author

The representation of authors of color in schizophrenia research articles published in high-impact psychiatric journals.

Schizophrenia research·2022
Same author

AOtools: a Python package for adaptive optics modelling and analysis.

Optics express·2019
Same author

Inherent Nonrandom Structure of the Pre-Nuclear Envelope Breakdown Calcium Signal in Sand Dollar (Echinaracnius parma) Embryos.

The Biological bulletin·2017
Same author

Identification of Phospholipase A<sub>2</sub> and Phospholipase C Activities in Calcium Regulatory Endomembranes of Sand Dollar Cells.

The Biological bulletin·2017

Area of Science:

  • Diagnostic imaging and local noise estimation in medical physics
  • Radiological informatics and image processing research

Background:

No prior work had fully resolved the challenges of quantifying non-uniform image degradation in low-dose computed tomography. Prior research has shown that image quality fluctuates significantly based on anatomical density and scanner geometry. That uncertainty drove the need for more precise, spatially-aware assessment tools. It was already known that standard global metrics fail to capture the complex noise patterns inherent in modern clinical scans. This gap motivated the development of techniques capable of adapting to specific tissue characteristics. Researchers have long struggled to differentiate between actual anatomical features and artifacts caused by low radiation exposure. Previous attempts often relied on simplified models that ignored the heterogeneous nature of human body composition. No prior work had established a robust framework for mapping these localized fluctuations across diverse patient datasets.

Purpose Of The Study:

The study aims to develop and validate an automated tissue-based estimator for quantifying localized noise in medical imaging. Researchers sought to address the limitations of global noise metrics that fail to account for anatomical heterogeneity. This gap motivated the team to create a method that adapts to varying tissue properties and scanner configurations. The investigators intended to provide a robust tool for monitoring image quality in low-dose chest examinations. That uncertainty drove the need for a system that could accurately map noise variations caused by X-ray source positioning. The authors aimed to improve the performance of automated segmentation algorithms by integrating these local noise estimates. No prior work had successfully implemented a tissue-aware approach that maintains high precision across diverse patient datasets. The researchers designed this study to characterize the magnitude of noise fluctuations and validate the effectiveness of their new algorithm.

Keywords:
radiological imagingimage quality assessmentlow-dose CTtissue segmentation

Frequently Asked Questions

The researchers propose a three-step process: partitioning the image into uniform and transition zones, calculating the standard deviation within fifteen-by-fifteen-by-one voxel windows for uniform areas, and interpolating these values across transition zones. This mechanism accounts for spatial variations in radiation exposure and tissue density.

The authors utilize a tissue-based estimator, which functions by identifying homogeneous regions within the scan. This tool enables the system to isolate noise measurements from anatomical structures, preventing the blurring of edges during the calculation process.

A fifteen-by-fifteen-by-one voxel window is necessary to compute the standard deviation accurately. The researchers propose that this specific spatial dimension balances the need for sufficient data points with the requirement to capture localized noise characteristics effectively.

More Related Videos

Three-Dimensional Reconstruction for the Whole Lung with Early Multiple Pulmonary Nodules
07:53

Three-Dimensional Reconstruction for the Whole Lung with Early Multiple Pulmonary Nodules

Published on: October 13, 2023

Retrospective Cardiac Gating with A Prototype Small-Animal X-ray Computed Tomograph
05:32

Retrospective Cardiac Gating with A Prototype Small-Animal X-ray Computed Tomograph

Published on: February 21, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 9, 2026

Lung CT Segmentation to Identify Consolidations and Ground Glass Areas for Quantitative Assesment of SARS-CoV Pneumonia
08:05

Lung CT Segmentation to Identify Consolidations and Ground Glass Areas for Quantitative Assesment of SARS-CoV Pneumonia

Published on: December 19, 2020

Three-Dimensional Reconstruction for the Whole Lung with Early Multiple Pulmonary Nodules
07:53

Three-Dimensional Reconstruction for the Whole Lung with Early Multiple Pulmonary Nodules

Published on: October 13, 2023

Retrospective Cardiac Gating with A Prototype Small-Animal X-ray Computed Tomograph
05:32

Retrospective Cardiac Gating with A Prototype Small-Animal X-ray Computed Tomograph

Published on: February 21, 2025

Main Methods:

The researchers designed an automated framework to quantify image quality by partitioning scans into distinct tissue categories. Their review approach involved testing the method on both anthropomorphic phantom models and clinical patient datasets. The team implemented a three-stage algorithm to isolate homogeneous regions before calculating standard deviations. They utilized a specific voxel-based window to ensure that measurements remained localized to relevant tissue types. The study evaluated the sensitivity of these estimates by varying the size of the computation regions. Researchers applied their technique to fifty scans sourced from a public lung cancer screening database. They performed quantitative validation using the phantom data to establish baseline accuracy metrics. Finally, the team conducted qualitative assessments on in vivo chest scans to confirm the practical utility of the proposed estimator.

Main Results:

Key findings from the literature indicate that image noise varies locally by over two hundred Hounsfield units in low-dose chest scans. The proposed estimator characterizes these fluctuations within a five percent margin of accuracy. The researchers demonstrated that their tissue-based approach successfully improves fat segmentation on all fifty tested patient scans. Quantitative analysis of phantom data confirmed the reliability of the noise mapping technique across different material densities. The study revealed that noise levels are highly sensitive to changes in X-ray source location and radiation dose. Qualitative results from patient imaging showed that the method effectively distinguishes between anatomical structures and background interference. The data suggest that the estimator provides a consistent metric for monitoring image quality across diverse clinical settings. These results highlight the capability of the algorithm to adapt to the heterogeneous nature of human tissue.

Conclusions:

The authors propose that their tissue-based approach reliably maps complex noise patterns in clinical imaging. This synthesis suggests that local variations can exceed two hundred Hounsfield units in low-dose chest examinations. The findings imply that accounting for these fluctuations is beneficial for refining automated segmentation tasks. The researchers indicate that their framework successfully enhances fat tissue identification across all tested patient samples. This review of evidence demonstrates that the method maintains high accuracy within a five percent margin. The authors suggest that their tool serves as a practical resource for ongoing image quality monitoring. They conclude that this approach supports the optimization of various denoising algorithms used in modern radiology. The study implies that future diagnostic workflows could benefit from integrating these localized noise metrics.

The researchers utilize phantom data for quantitative validation and in vivo patient scans for qualitative assessment. This dual data approach allows the team to compare controlled laboratory results against the complex, real-world noise patterns found in clinical chest imaging.

The team observed that noise levels can fluctuate by more than two hundred Hounsfield units in low-dose chest scans. This measurement highlights the significant impact of tissue properties and X-ray source positioning on image clarity.

The authors propose that this method provides a pathway for improving image quality monitoring and refining denoising algorithms. They suggest that these advancements are critical for enhancing the precision of automated segmentation tasks in clinical environments.