Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

How do only children differ from other children?

¹Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park 16802.

The Journal of Genetic Psychology

|June 1, 1990

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Atrophic violaceus pretibial plaques: when the clue is the oral mucosa.

Clinical and experimental dermatology·2020

Same author

Targeted lung cancer screening selects individuals at high risk of cardiovascular disease.

Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2018

Same author

Fans' Judgments About the 1994-95 Major League Baseball Players' Strike.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016

Same author

How Do People Think About Intelligence?

Multivariate behavioral research·2016

Same author

Pseudotumoral presentation of fungating mycetoma caused by Phaeoacremonium fuscum in a renal transplant patient.

Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society·2015

Same author

Evolution of Renal Transplant Practice Over the Past Decade: A U.K. Center Experience.

Transplantation proceedings·2015

Same journal

Emerging Challenges in Adolescent Mental Health, Neurodevelopment, and Digital Well-Being.

The Journal of genetic psychology·2026

Same journal

When Risks Accumulate: General Cumulative Risk Amplifies the Adverse Impact of Specific Risk on Problematic Online Behaviors Among Chinese Adolescents.

The Journal of genetic psychology·2026

Same journal

Understanding the Disgust-Anger Confusion: Developmental Evidence from Children's Emotion Recognition.

The Journal of genetic psychology·2026

Same journal

Attentional networks as moderators of the relationship between digital technology use and mental health among Cuban university students.

The Journal of genetic psychology·2026

Same journal

The Longitudinal Pathway from Body Appearance Perfectionism to Social Appearance Anxiety: The Mediating Role of Digital Filter Use and Moderating Role of Fear of Missing Out.

The Journal of genetic psychology·2026

Same journal

Family Influence or Zeitgeist? Evidence for Developmental Differences in the Intergenerational Transmission of Parent-Child Value Similarity.

The Journal of genetic psychology·2026

See all related articles

Only children show similar developmental outcomes to firstborns and those in two-child families, challenging previous theories. Positive outcomes are linked to the parent-child relationship, not family structure alone.

Area of Science:

Developmental Psychology
Family Studies
Sociology

Background:

Previous research on only children has yielded mixed results, often based on limited comparisons.
Meta-analyses suggest potential differences in developmental outcomes for only children compared to those with siblings.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate developmental outcomes of only children compared to non-only children, considering birth order and family size.
To test hypotheses derived from meta-analyses of only-child literature using independent comparison techniques.
To explore explanations for observed outcome differences, focusing on the parent-child relationship.

Main Methods:

Comparative analysis of developmental outcomes based on sibling status, birth order, and family size.
Application of independent comparison techniques to analyze data.

Related Experiment Videos

Testing hypotheses derived from existing meta-analyses on the only-child literature.

Main Results:

Developmental outcomes for only children were comparable to firstborns and children from two-child families.
Outcomes for only children differed from later-born children and those from larger families.
Children who were only children, firstborns, or from two-child families exhibited more positive outcomes than other groups.
Explanations focusing on only-child deprivation or uniqueness were not supported; the quality of the parent-child relationship was a significant factor.

Conclusions:

The developmental outcomes of only children are more aligned with firstborns and children from two-child families than previously assumed.
The parent-child relationship quality, rather than sibling status or family size alone, appears to be a key determinant of positive developmental outcomes.
Future research should maintain independent contrasts and broaden the definition of the 'only child' category to include firstborns and children from two-child families for more accurate comparisons.