Etiologies and predictors of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
Myung Hwan Bae1, Sang Soo Cheon, Joon Hyuk Song
1Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Korea.
Insights
False-positive ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) diagnoses occurred in 7.5% of patients, often due to conditions mimicking STEMI. Careful ECG interpretation can reduce unnecessary catheterization lab activation.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Emergency Medicine
- Diagnostic Imaging
Background:
- Rapid diagnosis of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is critical for patient management.
- False-positive STEMI diagnoses can lead to inappropriate cardiac catheterization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the prevalence, causes, and predictors of false-positive STEMI diagnoses.
- To identify factors leading to unnecessary catheterization lab activation.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 455 patients with presumptive STEMI diagnosis.
- Multivariate logistic regression to identify predictors of false-positive diagnoses.
Main Results:
- 34 patients (7.5%) had false-positive STEMI diagnoses.
- Common causes included coronary spasm, left ventricular hypertrophy, and myocarditis.
- Delayed presentation, non-chest pain symptoms, absence of Q waves, and lack of reciprocal ECG changes predicted false positives.
Conclusions:
- False-positive STEMI diagnoses are not uncommon, leading to unnecessary procedures.
- Accurate ECG interpretation and considering alternative diagnoses are essential to prevent inappropriate catheterization.
Background And Objectives:
Rapid diagnosis of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is essential for the appropriate management of patients. We investigated the prevalence, etiologies and predictors of false-positive diagnosis of STEMI and subsequent inappropriate catheterization laboratory activation in patients with presumptive diagnosis of STEMI.
Subjects And Methods:
Four hundred fifty-five consecutive patients (62±13 years, 345 males) with presumptive diagnosis of STEMI between August 2008 and November 2010 were included.
Results:
A false-positive diagnosis of STEMI was made in 34 patients (7.5%) with no indication of coronary artery lesion. Common causes for the false-positive diagnosis were coronary spasm in 10 patients, left ventricular hypertrophy in 5 patients, myocarditis in 4 patients, early repolarization in 3 patients, and previous myocardial infarction and stress-induced cardiomyopathy in 2 patients each. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, symptom-to-door time >12 hours {odds ratio (OR) 4.995, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.384-18.030, p=0.014}, presenting symptom other than chest pain (OR 7.709, 95% CI 1.255-39.922, p=0.027), absence of Q wave (OR 9.082, CI 2.631-31.351, p<0.001) and absence of reciprocal changes on electrocardiography (ECG) (OR 17.987, CI 5.295-61.106, p<0.001) were independent predictors of false-positive diagnosis of STEMI.
Conclusion:
In patients whom STEMI was planned for primary coronary intervention, the false-positive diagnosis of STEMI was not rare. Correct interpretation of ECGs and consideration of ST-segment elevation in conditions other than STEMI may reduce inappropriate catheterization laboratory activation.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Myocarditis I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Ischemic Stroke l: Introduction
Myocarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
