Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2026

05:59
Visualization of Intensity Levels to Reduce the Gap Between Self-Reported and Directly Measured Physical Activity
Published on: March 7, 2019
The Active for Life Year 5 (AFLY5) school-based cluster randomised controlled trial protocol: detailed statistical
Trials
|July 26, 2013
Summary
This study details the analysis plan for the Active For Life Year 5 (AFLY5) trial, evaluating its effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. The plan ensures unbiased results by pre-specifying analyses before data access.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Pediatric Health
- Health Services Research
Background:
- The Active For Life Year 5 (AFLY5) trial protocol was initially published in 2011.
- This document provides an updated, detailed analysis plan for the AFLY5 randomized controlled trial.
- The trial investigates an intervention aimed at improving physical activity in children.
Purpose of the Study:
- To outline a detailed analysis plan for the AFLY5 intervention's effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.
- To specify quality control procedures for variables and criteria for derived variables.
- To detail four key analyses: immediate effectiveness, mediation, long-term effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness.
Main Methods:
- The analysis plan details intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses.
- Sensitivity analyses for handling missing data are described.
- Quality control checks and definitions for derived variables are specified.
Main Results:
- Effectiveness analysis 1 examines outcomes at the end of the intervention school year.
- Mediation analyses explore the roles of self-efficacy, parental support, and knowledge.
- Effectiveness analysis 2 and cost-effectiveness analysis assess longer-term impacts and value.
Conclusions:
- This analysis plan was finalized before data access and approved by the AFLY5 Trial Steering Committee.
- Publication ensures analyses align with a priori objectives, preventing data-driven adjustments.
- The plan promotes transparency and rigor in evaluating the AFLY5 intervention.
Related Concept Videos
Study Design in Statistics
A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.
Actuarial Approach
The actuarial approach, a statistical method originally developed for life insurance risk assessment, is widely used to calculate survival rates in clinical and population studies. This method accounts for participants lost to follow-up or those who die from causes unrelated to the study, ensuring a more accurate representation of survival probabilities.
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Group Design
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between the two are due to...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...
