Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2026

Ferric Chloride-induced Murine Thrombosis Models
Published on: September 5, 2016
Why have studies of tailored anti-platelet therapy failed so far?
Jolanta M Siller-Matula1, Bernd Jilma
1Jolanta Siller-Matula, MD, PhD, Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, Tel.: +43 1 40 400 4614, Fax: +43 1 40 400 4216,
Abstract:
Published data linking clopidogrel non-responsiveness to adverse ischaemic events lead to the suggestion that the magnitude of platelet inhibition by clopidogrel can be monitored and individually adjusted. This has been tested in randomised clinical trials (ARCTIC, GRAVITAS and TRIGGER-PCI), but despite reducing platelet reactivity, a strategy of therapy adjustment based on platelet function monitoring did not reduce the incidence of cardiac ischaemic events. Several critical issues regarding the design of these trials, which might in part have led to negative results, are discussed in this article.
Insights
Monitoring clopidogrel therapy by measuring platelet inhibition did not reduce cardiac events in clinical trials. Despite lowering platelet reactivity, this individualized approach showed no benefit for patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Published data suggests a link between clopidogrel non-responsiveness and adverse ischemic events.
- This led to the hypothesis that monitoring and adjusting clopidogrel's platelet inhibition could improve patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of adjusting clopidogrel therapy based on platelet function monitoring in reducing cardiac ischemic events.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of randomized clinical trials including ARCTIC, GRAVITAS, and TRIGGER-PCI.
- Assessment of strategies involving therapy adjustment guided by platelet function monitoring.
Main Results:
- While platelet reactivity was reduced, the strategy of adjusting clopidogrel therapy did not decrease the incidence of cardiac ischemic events.
- The trials did not demonstrate a clinical benefit from individualized antiplatelet therapy based on platelet function tests.
Conclusions:
- Despite reducing platelet reactivity, therapy adjustment based on platelet function monitoring did not reduce cardiac ischemic events in the studied trials.
- Critical issues in trial design may have contributed to the negative results and warrant further discussion.
Related Concept Videos
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Formation of the Platelet Plug
As the injured blood vessel contracts, endothelial cells undergo contraction, revealing collagen fibers in the basement membrane and underlying connective tissue. Furthermore, the plasma membrane of endothelial cells becomes adhesive, preparing the site for platelet adhesion. Platelets...
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Problems
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Calcium Channel Blockers
TKIs, such as imatinib (Gleevec), are particularly effective in tackling the growth and mitogenic factors that become upregulated in PAH patients. These factors contribute to the...

