Attribution Theory
Fundamental Attribution Error
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory
Biological Influences on Intelligence
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
Correspondence Bias
You might also read
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Updated: May 9, 2026

Symmetric Bihemispheric Postmortem Brain Cutting to Study Healthy and Pathological Brain Conditions in Humans
Published on: December 18, 2016
Harriet Cullen1, Ryota Kanai2, Bahador Bahrami2
1UCL Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, 17 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3AR and Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, 12 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK harriet.cullen@doctors.org.uk.
This study explores how individual differences in the tendency to attribute human traits to non-human entities relate to specific variations in brain structure. By analyzing magnetic resonance imaging data from healthy adults, researchers identified a link between the volume of a brain region involved in social cognition and the frequency of anthropomorphic thinking regarding animals. These findings suggest that the neural systems used to understand other people also support our tendency to perceive human-like qualities in the non-human world.
Area of Science:
Background:
No prior work had fully resolved the neural basis for why people vary in their tendency to project human traits onto non-human entities. While anthropomorphism is a common human experience, the biological roots of this individual variability remain largely unexplored. Prior research has shown that mentalizing networks are active when individuals infer the internal states of other people. That uncertainty drove the current investigation into whether these social brain regions also facilitate anthropomorphic projections. It was already known that the temporoparietal junction plays a significant role in processing social information. This gap motivated the researchers to examine if structural differences in this area correlate with self-reported anthropomorphic tendencies. The study builds upon existing frameworks linking social cognition to the perception of non-human stimuli. By focusing on healthy young adults, the authors sought to clarify the anatomical correlates of this pervasive psychological phenomenon.
Purpose Of The Study:
The study aimed to determine if individual differences in anthropomorphic attributions are linked to specific variations in human brain structure. Researchers sought to investigate whether the neural systems responsible for mentalizing also support the tendency to project human traits onto non-human entities. This inquiry was motivated by the observation that anthropomorphism varies significantly among people despite its widespread occurrence. The authors hypothesized that the mentalizing network, which is active during social interactions, might be involved in these attributions. By testing this hypothesis, they intended to clarify the biological basis of this psychological phenomenon. The researchers addressed the uncertainty regarding whether structural brain differences could explain why some individuals are more prone to anthropomorphic thinking than others. They focused on the relationship between grey matter volume and self-reported tendencies in a sample of healthy young adults. This work serves to integrate social neuroscience with the study of human perception of the non-human world.
Main Methods:
The research team employed a cross-sectional design involving eighty-three healthy young adults to examine brain-behavior relationships. They utilized high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging to capture detailed maps of cortical grey matter volume. Participants completed a standardized self-report instrument to quantify their propensity for attributing human traits to non-human entities. The investigators performed voxel-based morphometry to identify significant correlations between regional brain volume and behavioral scores. This approach allowed for the precise mapping of structural variations across the entire brain. Statistical models controlled for potential confounding variables to ensure the robustness of the observed associations. The analysis focused specifically on regions previously implicated in social cognition and mentalizing tasks. This methodological framework provided a rigorous way to test the hypothesized link between neural architecture and psychological tendencies.
Main Results:
The strongest finding indicates that grey matter volume in the left temporoparietal junction correlates positively with anthropomorphic attributions toward animals. This specific association suggests that structural variations in this cortical area underpin individual differences in how people perceive non-human life. The data revealed that this relationship was significant within the cohort of eighty-three healthy young adults. No such correlation was observed for non-animal stimuli, suggesting a degree of specificity in the neural recruitment. The results provide quantitative support for the theory that mentalizing networks are involved in anthropomorphic thinking. These findings align with previous literature describing the role of the temporoparietal junction in social information processing. The observed structural link offers a clear biological marker for the observed variability in human behavior. The study successfully demonstrates that brain anatomy can predict aspects of how individuals interpret the non-human world.
Conclusions:
The authors propose that the left temporoparietal junction serves as a biological substrate for anthropomorphic tendencies. This finding aligns with evidence that mentalizing networks are recruited when individuals perceive non-human entities. The researchers suggest that the capacity to attribute mental states to others is linked to the projection of human characteristics onto animals. These results provide a structural basis for understanding why some individuals engage in anthropomorphism more frequently than others. The data support the hypothesis that social cognition mechanisms are repurposed for non-human stimuli. This study implies that the neural architecture for social interaction is broader than previously assumed. The findings offer a potential explanation for the observed inter-individual variability in anthropomorphic thinking. Future investigations might further delineate how these structural differences influence social behavior in diverse contexts.
The researchers propose that the left temporoparietal junction facilitates anthropomorphism. This specific brain region, which is typically involved in mentalizing, showed a correlation between its grey matter volume and the frequency of human-like attributions regarding animals in the study participants.
The team utilized magnetic resonance imaging to quantify grey matter volume across the brain. This structural data was then compared against scores from a self-report questionnaire designed to measure the extent of anthropomorphic thinking in the eighty-three healthy young adult participants.
The authors focused on the temporoparietal junction because it is a known component of the mentalizing network. This region is necessary for attributing mental states to other humans, and the researchers hypothesized that this same circuitry would be recruited when perceiving non-human animals.
The researchers relied on self-report questionnaires to capture individual differences in anthropomorphic tendencies. This data type allowed them to quantify the degree to which participants attributed human characteristics to both non-human animals and various non-animal stimuli during the assessment process.
The study measured grey matter volume as the primary indicator of brain structure. This metric was compared with the behavioral scores to determine if structural variations in specific cortical regions could account for the observed differences in how people perceive non-human entities.
The authors suggest that their findings bridge the gap between social cognition and anthropomorphism. They claim that the neural systems used to understand other humans are also engaged when individuals project human-like qualities onto animals, highlighting a shared biological foundation for these processes.