Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Attribution Theory00:56

Attribution Theory

Behavior is a product of both the situation (e.g., cultural influences, social roles, and the presence of bystanders) and of the person (e.g., personality characteristics). Subfields of psychology tend to focus on one influence or behavior over others. Situationism is the view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment and surroundings. In contrast, dispositionism holds that our behavior is determined by internal factors (Heider, 1958). An internal factor is an...
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is called the fundamental attribution...
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory01:15

Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...
Biological Influences on Intelligence01:30

Biological Influences on Intelligence

Intelligence is often thought to be linked to brain size, but the relationship is more complex than that. While brain size does correlate modestly with some abilities, like verbal skills, the connection is weaker for others, such as spatial reasoning. Other factors, like brain structure, also play crucial roles. For instance, despite Einstein's smaller-than-average brain, his parietal cortex, which is involved in spatial reasoning, was 15% wider, suggesting that neural density might matter more...
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory01:29

Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus: Comparing...
Correspondence Bias01:17

Correspondence Bias

Correspondence bias, also referred to as the fundamental attribution error, describes the tendency to attribute another person’s behavior to internal characteristics rather than situational influences. This cognitive bias leads individuals to overlook external factors that may be influencing actions, thereby fostering potentially inaccurate assessments of others’ intentions and dispositions.Empirical Evidence for Correspondence BiasResearch has consistently demonstrated the prevalence of...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Model-Free Reinforcement Learning Implementation of Decision Making Under Uncertainty by Sequential Sampling.

Neural computation·2026
Same author

Collective intelligence in clinical medicine: what works, what fails, and how collaboration with AI really helps.

Presse medicale (Paris, France : 1983)·2026
Same author

The Temporal Dynamics of Attentional Allocation during Counterfactual Learning.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same author

Could agentic AI topple grant-funding systems?

Nature·2026
Same author

Covert neural and autonomic signatures of shared perception.

Social cognitive and affective neuroscience·2026
Same author

Human pairs show collective benefit in olfactory perception despite individual differences and verbal limits.

iScience·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 9, 2026

Symmetric Bihemispheric Postmortem Brain Cutting to Study Healthy and Pathological Brain Conditions in Humans
08:29

Symmetric Bihemispheric Postmortem Brain Cutting to Study Healthy and Pathological Brain Conditions in Humans

Published on: December 18, 2016

Individual differences in anthropomorphic attributions and human brain structure.

Harriet Cullen1, Ryota Kanai2, Bahador Bahrami2

  • 1UCL Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, 17 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3AR and Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, 12 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK harriet.cullen@doctors.org.uk.

Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
|July 27, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study explores how individual differences in the tendency to attribute human traits to non-human entities relate to specific variations in brain structure. By analyzing magnetic resonance imaging data from healthy adults, researchers identified a link between the volume of a brain region involved in social cognition and the frequency of anthropomorphic thinking regarding animals. These findings suggest that the neural systems used to understand other people also support our tendency to perceive human-like qualities in the non-human world.

Keywords:
anthropomorphismmentalizing and VBMtemporoparietal junctionsocial cognitionmentalizing networkgrey matter volumetemporoparietal junctionvoxel-based morphometry

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

A Comparative Approach for Quantitative Cell Counting Studies in Widely Different Mammalian Brains
07:14

A Comparative Approach for Quantitative Cell Counting Studies in Widely Different Mammalian Brains

Published on: January 16, 2026

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 9, 2026

Symmetric Bihemispheric Postmortem Brain Cutting to Study Healthy and Pathological Brain Conditions in Humans
08:29

Symmetric Bihemispheric Postmortem Brain Cutting to Study Healthy and Pathological Brain Conditions in Humans

Published on: December 18, 2016

A Comparative Approach for Quantitative Cell Counting Studies in Widely Different Mammalian Brains
07:14

A Comparative Approach for Quantitative Cell Counting Studies in Widely Different Mammalian Brains

Published on: January 16, 2026

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive neuroscience research on anthropomorphic attributions
  • Neuroanatomy and structural brain imaging

Background:

No prior work had fully resolved the neural basis for why people vary in their tendency to project human traits onto non-human entities. While anthropomorphism is a common human experience, the biological roots of this individual variability remain largely unexplored. Prior research has shown that mentalizing networks are active when individuals infer the internal states of other people. That uncertainty drove the current investigation into whether these social brain regions also facilitate anthropomorphic projections. It was already known that the temporoparietal junction plays a significant role in processing social information. This gap motivated the researchers to examine if structural differences in this area correlate with self-reported anthropomorphic tendencies. The study builds upon existing frameworks linking social cognition to the perception of non-human stimuli. By focusing on healthy young adults, the authors sought to clarify the anatomical correlates of this pervasive psychological phenomenon.

Purpose Of The Study:

The study aimed to determine if individual differences in anthropomorphic attributions are linked to specific variations in human brain structure. Researchers sought to investigate whether the neural systems responsible for mentalizing also support the tendency to project human traits onto non-human entities. This inquiry was motivated by the observation that anthropomorphism varies significantly among people despite its widespread occurrence. The authors hypothesized that the mentalizing network, which is active during social interactions, might be involved in these attributions. By testing this hypothesis, they intended to clarify the biological basis of this psychological phenomenon. The researchers addressed the uncertainty regarding whether structural brain differences could explain why some individuals are more prone to anthropomorphic thinking than others. They focused on the relationship between grey matter volume and self-reported tendencies in a sample of healthy young adults. This work serves to integrate social neuroscience with the study of human perception of the non-human world.

Main Methods:

The research team employed a cross-sectional design involving eighty-three healthy young adults to examine brain-behavior relationships. They utilized high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging to capture detailed maps of cortical grey matter volume. Participants completed a standardized self-report instrument to quantify their propensity for attributing human traits to non-human entities. The investigators performed voxel-based morphometry to identify significant correlations between regional brain volume and behavioral scores. This approach allowed for the precise mapping of structural variations across the entire brain. Statistical models controlled for potential confounding variables to ensure the robustness of the observed associations. The analysis focused specifically on regions previously implicated in social cognition and mentalizing tasks. This methodological framework provided a rigorous way to test the hypothesized link between neural architecture and psychological tendencies.

Main Results:

The strongest finding indicates that grey matter volume in the left temporoparietal junction correlates positively with anthropomorphic attributions toward animals. This specific association suggests that structural variations in this cortical area underpin individual differences in how people perceive non-human life. The data revealed that this relationship was significant within the cohort of eighty-three healthy young adults. No such correlation was observed for non-animal stimuli, suggesting a degree of specificity in the neural recruitment. The results provide quantitative support for the theory that mentalizing networks are involved in anthropomorphic thinking. These findings align with previous literature describing the role of the temporoparietal junction in social information processing. The observed structural link offers a clear biological marker for the observed variability in human behavior. The study successfully demonstrates that brain anatomy can predict aspects of how individuals interpret the non-human world.

Conclusions:

The authors propose that the left temporoparietal junction serves as a biological substrate for anthropomorphic tendencies. This finding aligns with evidence that mentalizing networks are recruited when individuals perceive non-human entities. The researchers suggest that the capacity to attribute mental states to others is linked to the projection of human characteristics onto animals. These results provide a structural basis for understanding why some individuals engage in anthropomorphism more frequently than others. The data support the hypothesis that social cognition mechanisms are repurposed for non-human stimuli. This study implies that the neural architecture for social interaction is broader than previously assumed. The findings offer a potential explanation for the observed inter-individual variability in anthropomorphic thinking. Future investigations might further delineate how these structural differences influence social behavior in diverse contexts.

The researchers propose that the left temporoparietal junction facilitates anthropomorphism. This specific brain region, which is typically involved in mentalizing, showed a correlation between its grey matter volume and the frequency of human-like attributions regarding animals in the study participants.

The team utilized magnetic resonance imaging to quantify grey matter volume across the brain. This structural data was then compared against scores from a self-report questionnaire designed to measure the extent of anthropomorphic thinking in the eighty-three healthy young adult participants.

The authors focused on the temporoparietal junction because it is a known component of the mentalizing network. This region is necessary for attributing mental states to other humans, and the researchers hypothesized that this same circuitry would be recruited when perceiving non-human animals.

The researchers relied on self-report questionnaires to capture individual differences in anthropomorphic tendencies. This data type allowed them to quantify the degree to which participants attributed human characteristics to both non-human animals and various non-animal stimuli during the assessment process.

The study measured grey matter volume as the primary indicator of brain structure. This metric was compared with the behavioral scores to determine if structural variations in specific cortical regions could account for the observed differences in how people perceive non-human entities.

The authors suggest that their findings bridge the gap between social cognition and anthropomorphism. They claim that the neural systems used to understand other humans are also engaged when individuals project human-like qualities onto animals, highlighting a shared biological foundation for these processes.