Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Punishment01:27

Punishment

Negative reinforcement and punishment are often confused but serve distinct functions in behavior modification. Reinforcement, whether positive or negative, increases the likelihood of a desired behavior, while punishment decreases it.
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior.
Milgram's Obedience to Authority02:20

Milgram's Obedience to Authority

Obedience to authority is classically demonstrated in a more famous series of social psychology experiments performed by Stanley Milgram. He was a social psychology professor at Yale who was influenced by the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi war criminal. Eichmann’s defense for the atrocities he committed was that he was “just following orders.”
Operant Conditioning01:21

Operant Conditioning

Operant conditioning, a key concept in behavioral psychology, involves using reinforcement and punishment to alter the likelihood of a behavior being repeated. B.F. introduced this type of conditioning. Skinner focused on voluntary behaviors and the consequences that follow them, influencing whether these behaviors will be strengthened or diminished.
Reinforcement in operant conditioning can be positive or negative, both of which serve to increase the likelihood of a behavior. Positive...
The Stanford Prison Experiment03:20

The Stanford Prison Experiment

The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
Behavior Modification01:21

Behavior Modification

Behavioral approaches have often been criticized for ignoring mental processes and focusing solely on observable behavior. However, these approaches provide an optimistic perspective for individuals seeking to change their behaviors. Rather than concentrating on intrinsic personality traits, behavioral approaches suggest that even longstanding habits can be modified by changing the reward contingencies that maintain them.
A real-world application of operant conditioning principles is applied...
Law of Effect01:06

Law of Effect

B.F. Skinner, a prominent figure in behavioral psychology, introduced operant conditioning by emphasizing the role of consequences in shaping behavior. This theory builds upon the law of effect proposed by Edward Thorndike, which posits that behaviors followed by satisfying outcomes are likely to be repeated. In contrast, those followed by unsatisfying outcomes are less likely to recur.
Edward Thorndike's foundational work involved studying learning in animals, particularly using puzzle boxes...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Altruism and natural selection in a variable environment.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2024
Same author

Growth of brown trout in the wild predicted by embryo stress reaction in the laboratory.

Ecology·2024
Same author

Parental kinship coefficient but not paternal coloration predicts early offspring growth in lake char.

Heredity·2024
Same author

Sex-specific effects of inbreeding in juvenile brown trout.

Molecular ecology·2024
Same author

Non-equilibrium molecular dynamics of steady-state fluid transport through a 2D membrane driven by a concentration gradient.

The Journal of chemical physics·2023
Same author

Sperm of more colourful males are better adapted to ovarian fluids in lake char (Salmonidae).

Molecular ecology·2023
Same journal

Superorganismal Anisogamy: A Comparative Test of an Extended Theory.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2026
Same journal

The role of microbial resource mutualists in plant adaptation to abiotic environments.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2026
Same journal

Museum genomics links MC1R alleles to adaptive winter coat color polymorphism in the long-tailed weasel.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2026
Same journal

Repeated evolution of iridescence and hindwing tails is associated with morphometric flight proxies in skipper butterflies.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2026
Same journal

Temperature-dependent competition predicts contrasting outcomes of adjacent secondary contact zones in darters (Percidae:Etheostoma).

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2026
Same journal

Sex allocation of hermaphrodites in metapopulations with frequent population extinction and recolonization.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 9, 2026

A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence
08:05

A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence

Published on: March 23, 2022

Human cooperation based on punishment reputation.

Miguel dos Santos1, Daniel J Rankin, Claus Wedekind

  • 1Department of Ecology and Evolution, Biophore, University of Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution
|July 30, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Punishment promotes cooperation by building a reputation for fairness. This reputation helps punishers gain more help, increasing group cooperation, but only if the reputation for punishment is maintained.

Keywords:
Experimental game theoryindirect reciprocitypunishment

More Related Videos

Training Laboratory Rabbits to Refine Routine Husbandry Procedures
05:21

Training Laboratory Rabbits to Refine Routine Husbandry Procedures

Published on: February 16, 2024

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats
06:11

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats

Published on: February 20, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 9, 2026

A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence
08:05

A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence

Published on: March 23, 2022

Training Laboratory Rabbits to Refine Routine Husbandry Procedures
05:21

Training Laboratory Rabbits to Refine Routine Husbandry Procedures

Published on: February 16, 2024

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats
06:11

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats

Published on: February 20, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary biology
  • Behavioral economics
  • Social psychology

Background:

  • Punishment often enhances cooperation but is costly and rare in nature.
  • The evolutionary origins of costly punishment remain unclear.
  • Reputation games offer a potential explanation for the evolution of punishment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of reputation in the evolution of punishment.
  • To test the hypothesis that punishment evolved within reputation games.
  • To examine how punishment reputation influences cooperation in helping games.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted a helping game experiment with human participants.
  • Included conditions with observers, punishment, and punishment reputation.
  • Experimentally controlled for other potential reputational effects.

Main Results:

  • Punishers recouped their costs by receiving more help.
  • Higher likelihood of punishment for defection correlated with increased group cooperation.
  • The positive effects of punishment on cooperation disappeared when reputation was removed.

Conclusions:

  • Reputation is crucial for the evolution and maintenance of costly punishment.
  • Punishment's benefits are mediated by the social reputation it confers.
  • Understanding reputation is key to understanding the evolution of cooperation and punishment.