Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2026

Use of a Psychophysiological Script-driven Imagery Experiment to Study Trauma-related Dissociation in Borderline Personality Disorder
Published on: March 8, 2018
Discriminating value of total minor physical anomaly score on the Waldrop scale between patients with bipolar I
Stefan Sivkov1, Valentin Akabaliev, Mladen Mantarkov
1Department of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, Medical University, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Abstract:
Minor physical anomalies (MPAs) are slight structural aberrations indicative of abnormal neurodevelopment. Most studies of MPAs in bipolar disorder have yielded limited results. We attempted to assess the potential value of MPAs as a classifying test in the status bipolar I patients vs. normal controls. Sixty one bipolar I patients and 103 controls were evaluated for MPAs using a slightly modified version of the Waldrop scale. The specificity, sensitivity and predictive value of different total MPA (MPA-T) scores were determined. The cut-off MPA-T scores that optimally discriminated patients from controls (exhibiting the most balanced sets of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values) were MPA-T ≥ 4 and MPA-T ≥ 5. These values set a "border zone" in which bipolar I patients began to prevail significantly over controls. The latter presented most frequently with MPA-T ≤ 3 and rarely with MPA-T ≥ 6. Bipolar I patients prevailed among outliers (subjects with significantly higher MPA-T scores). Our data establish MPA-T score as a reliable index in distinguishing between bipolar I patients and normal controls and are consistent with the hypothesis of abnormal neurodevelopment in bipolar disorder.
Insights
Minor physical anomalies (MPAs) can help classify bipolar I disorder. Higher MPA scores reliably distinguish patients from healthy individuals, supporting neurodevelopmental theories.
Area of Science:
- Neurodevelopmental disorders
- Psychiatric diagnostics
Background:
- Minor physical anomalies (MPAs) are subtle structural variations linked to neurodevelopmental abnormalities.
- Previous research on MPAs in bipolar disorder has produced inconclusive findings.
- The diagnostic utility of MPAs in differentiating bipolar I disorder requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of MPAs as a classification tool for distinguishing bipolar I patients from healthy controls.
- To determine the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of total MPA (MPA-T) scores.
Main Methods:
- A modified Waldrop scale was used to assess MPAs in 61 bipolar I patients and 103 controls.
- Total MPA (MPA-T) scores were analyzed to identify optimal cut-off points for discrimination.
- Statistical analysis determined sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values for various MPA-T scores.
Main Results:
- Optimal cut-off scores of MPA-T ≥ 4 and MPA-T ≥ 5 effectively discriminated between bipolar I patients and controls.
- Bipolar I patients showed significantly higher MPA-T scores compared to controls, particularly in outlier cases.
- Controls typically presented with MPA-T scores ≤ 3, while scores ≥ 6 were rare.
Conclusions:
- The total MPA (MPA-T) score serves as a reliable indicator for differentiating bipolar I disorder patients from healthy individuals.
- Findings support the hypothesis of aberrant neurodevelopment underlying bipolar disorder.
- MPAs show potential as a supplementary diagnostic marker in psychiatric assessments.
Related Concept Videos
Bipolar Disorder
Regression Toward the Mean