Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2026

Cost-effective Method for Microbial Source Tracking Using Specific Human and Animal Viruses
Published on: December 3, 2011
Recommendations following a multi-laboratory comparison of microbial source tracking methods
Jill R Stewart1, Alexandria B Boehm, Eric A Dubinsky
1Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, 1301 Michael Hooker Research Center, 135 Dauer Drive, Campus Box #7431, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Abstract:
Microbial source tracking (MST) methods were evaluated in the Source Identification Protocol Project (SIPP), in which 27 laboratories compared methods to identify host sources of fecal pollution from blinded water samples containing either one or two different fecal types collected from California. This paper details lessons learned from the SIPP study and makes recommendations to further advance the field of MST. Overall, results from the SIPP study demonstrated that methods are available that can correctly identify whether particular host sources including humans, cows and birds have contributed to contamination in a body of water. However, differences between laboratory protocols and data processing affected results and complicated interpretation of MST method performance in some cases. This was an issue particularly for samples that tested positive (non-zero Ct values) but below the limits of quantification or detection of a PCR assay. Although false positives were observed, such samples in the SIPP study often contained the fecal pollution source that was being targeted, i.e., the samples were true positives. Given these results, and the fact that MST often requires detection of targets present in low concentrations, we propose that such samples be reported and identified in a unique category to facilitate data analysis and method comparisons. Important data can be lost when such samples are simply reported as positive or negative. Actionable thresholds were not derived in the SIPP study due to limitations that included geographic scope, age of samples, and difficulties interpreting low concentrations of target in environmental samples. Nevertheless, the results of the study support the use of MST for water management, especially to prioritize impaired waters in need of remediation. Future integration of MST data into quantitative microbial risk assessments and other models could allow managers to more efficiently protect public health based on site conditions.
Insights
Microbial source tracking (MST) methods can identify fecal pollution sources like humans, cows, and birds in water. Standardizing lab protocols is crucial for accurate results and effective water management.
Area of Science:
- Environmental microbiology
- Water quality assessment
- Molecular biology techniques
Background:
- Microbial source tracking (MST) is vital for identifying fecal pollution origins in water bodies.
- The Source Identification Protocol Project (SIPP) aimed to evaluate various MST methods.
- Fecal pollution poses risks to public health and aquatic ecosystems.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the performance of different MST methods in identifying host sources of fecal pollution.
- To identify challenges and limitations in current MST methodologies.
- To provide recommendations for advancing the field of MST.
Main Methods:
- Evaluation of 27 laboratories comparing multiple MST methods.
- Analysis of blinded water samples with single or mixed fecal sources from California.
- Assessment of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay results, including low concentration detections.
Main Results:
- MST methods demonstrated capability in identifying human, cow, and bird fecal sources.
- Variations in laboratory protocols and data processing impacted MST results interpretation.
- Samples with low target concentrations (near limits of detection/quantification) presented interpretation challenges but were often true positives.
Conclusions:
- MST is a valuable tool for water management, aiding in prioritizing remediation efforts for impaired waters.
- Standardizing MST protocols and data analysis is essential for reliable method comparison and interpretation.
- Proposing a unique reporting category for low-concentration positive samples could improve data analysis and method evaluation.
- Further integration of MST data into risk assessments can enhance public health protection strategies.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Modern Molecular Taxonomy
Methods to Assess Microbial Populations
Methods of Classification and Identification
Automated Microbial Diagnostics

