Onartuzumab (MetMAb): using nonclinical pharmacokinetic and concentration-effect data to support clinical development

Hong Xiang1, Brendan C Bender, Arthur E Reyes

  • 1Authors' Affiliations: Departments of Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Sciences, Translational Oncology, Bioanalytical Sciences, Biochemical and Cellular Pharmacology, and Portfolio Management and Operations, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco; Quantitative Solutions, Menlo Park; Medivation, Inc., San Francisco; and Celgene, San Diego, California.

Abstract

Insights

Onartuzumab (MetMAb) exhibits faster clearance than typical antibodies. Dosing flexibility is supported, with 10-30 mg/kg every 3 weeks projected to achieve therapeutic onartuzumab concentrations.

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
  • Monoclonal Antibody Therapeutics
  • Oncology Drug Development

Background:

  • Onartuzumab (MetMAb) is a bivalent monoclonal antibody targeting the MET receptor tyrosine kinase.
  • Understanding its pharmacokinetic (PK) profile is crucial for optimizing clinical dosing strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To characterize onartuzumab pharmacokinetics in preclinical species.
  • To establish a concentration-effect relationship in tumor-bearing mice.
  • To project clinical PK parameters and determine target doses for onartuzumab therapy.

Main Methods:

  • Tumor growth inhibition models were used to determine tumoristatic concentrations (TSC) in mice.
  • Human PK parameters were extrapolated from cynomolgus monkey data using the species-invariant time method.
  • Monte Carlo simulations predicted patient exposure to target concentrations.

Main Results:

  • Onartuzumab demonstrated faster clearance (CL) in mice and monkeys compared to typical antibodies.
  • The estimated TSC in mice was 15 μg/mL.
  • Projected human CL ranged from 5.74 to 9.36 mL/d/kg, with a Q3W dose of 10-30 mg/kg predicted to achieve target trough concentrations (Ctrough ss) in ≥95% of patients.

Conclusions:

  • Onartuzumab's PK profile supports dose flexibility, allowing for Q1W to Q3W dosing regimens.
  • A target Ctrough ss of 15 μg/mL is proposed for clinical efficacy.
  • The projected human efficacious dose of 10-30 mg/kg Q3W is supported by PK/PD modeling.

Related Concept Videos

Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions01:15

Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions

PK–PD modeling has significantly influenced FDA regulatory decisions, particularly drug approval, dosage optimization, and labeling. These models integrate pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) to predict drug behavior and effects, aiding in optimizing dosing regimens and enhancing the probability of clinical trial success.One notable example is Nesiritide (Natrecor®), a recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide for treating acute decompensated congestive heart failure (CHF).
Preclinical Development: Overview01:28

Preclinical Development: Overview

Preclinical development consists of a series of tests that ensure the safety and efficacy of a new therapeutic compound before it is tested in humans. There are four main phases to this process. First, safety pharmacology tests are conducted to ensure the drug does not produce any acutely harmful effects. These tests examine parameters such as bronchoconstriction, cardiac dysrhythmias, blood pressure changes, and ataxia. Next, preliminary toxicological testing is performed to determine the...
Pharmacodynamic Models: Linear Concentration–Effect Model01:15

Pharmacodynamic Models: Linear Concentration–Effect Model

The linear concentration–effect model, underpinned by the principle that pharmacological effect (E) is directly proportional to plasma drug concentration (C), emerges as a pivotal simplification of the Emax model for conditions where C is significantly less than EC50. This model portrays a linear trajectory of the concentration–effect relationship when drug levels are markedly below the EC50 threshold.Despite its inherent assumption of continuous effect augmentation with increasing drug...
Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Problems01:24

Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Problems

The empirical approach to drug therapy optimization relies on correlating pharmacological response with administered dosage. Such an approach can be costly, time-consuming, and often yields poor correlation due to variables like formulation factors and drug elimination characteristics. A more precise approach correlates response with plasma drug concentration or the amount of drug in the body, rather than dosage. This is achieved through pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling, which...
Drug Concentration Versus Time Correlation01:15

Drug Concentration Versus Time Correlation

The plasma drug concentration-time curve is a crucial tool in pharmacokinetics, representing the drug's concentration in plasma at different time intervals post-administration. This curve illustrates the drug's journey from absorption into the systemic circulation, distribution to body tissues, and eventual elimination through excretion or biotransformation.
Two pivotal parameters are the minimum effective concentration (MEC) and the minimum toxic concentration (MTC). The MEC is the lowest drug...
Model-Independent Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Noncompartmental Analysis00:59

Model-Independent Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Noncompartmental Analysis

Noncompartmental analyses offer an alternative method for describing drug pharmacokinetics without relying on a specific compartmental model. In this approach, the drug's pharmacokinetics are assumed to be linear, with the terminal phase log-linear. This assumption allows for simplified analysis and interpretation of the drug's behavior in the body.
One important characteristic of noncompartmental analyses is that drug exposure increases proportionally with increasing doses. This relationship...