Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2026

Genetic Encoding of a Non-Canonical Amino Acid for the Generation of Antibody-Drug Conjugates Through a Fast Bioorthogonal Reaction
Published on: September 14, 2018
Onartuzumab (MetMAb): using nonclinical pharmacokinetic and concentration-effect data to support clinical development
Hong Xiang1, Brendan C Bender, Arthur E Reyes
1Authors' Affiliations: Departments of Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Sciences, Translational Oncology, Bioanalytical Sciences, Biochemical and Cellular Pharmacology, and Portfolio Management and Operations, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco; Quantitative Solutions, Menlo Park; Medivation, Inc., San Francisco; and Celgene, San Diego, California.
Purpose:
We characterized the pharmacokinetics of onartuzumab (MetMAb) in animals and determined a concentration-effect relationship in tumor-bearing mice to enable estimation of clinical pharmacokinetics and target doses.
Experimental Design:
A tumor growth inhibition model was used to estimate tumoristatic concentrations (TSC) in mice. Human pharmacokinetic parameters were projected from pharmacokinetics in cynomolgus monkeys by the species-invariant time method. Monte Carlo simulations predicted the percentage of patients achieving steady-state trough serum concentrations (Ctrough ss) ≥TSC for every 3-week (Q3W) dosing.
Results:
Onartuzumab clearance (CL) in the linear dose range was 21.1 and 12.2 mL/d/kg in mice and cynomolgus monkeys with elimination half-life at 6.10 and 3.37 days, respectively. The estimated TSC in KP4 pancreatic xenograft tumor-bearing mice was 15 μg/mL. Projected CL for humans in the linear dose range was 5.74 to 9.36 mL/d/kg with scaling exponents of CL at 0.75 to 0.9. Monte Carlo simulations projected a Q3W dose of 10 to 30 mg/kg to achieve Ctrough ss of 15 μg/mL in 95% or more of patients.
Conclusions:
Onartuzumab pharmacokinetics differed from typical bivalent glycosylated monoclonal antibodies with approximately 2-times faster CL in the linear dose range. Despite this higher CL, xenograft efficacy data supported dose flexibility with Q1W to Q3W dose regimens in the clinical setting with a TSC of 15 μg/mL as the Ctrough ss target. The projected human efficacious dose of 10 to 30 mg/kg Q3W should achieve the target TSC of 15 μg/mL. These data show effective pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling to project doses to be tested in the clinic.
Insights
Onartuzumab (MetMAb) exhibits faster clearance than typical antibodies. Dosing flexibility is supported, with 10-30 mg/kg every 3 weeks projected to achieve therapeutic onartuzumab concentrations.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
- Monoclonal Antibody Therapeutics
- Oncology Drug Development
Background:
- Onartuzumab (MetMAb) is a bivalent monoclonal antibody targeting the MET receptor tyrosine kinase.
- Understanding its pharmacokinetic (PK) profile is crucial for optimizing clinical dosing strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To characterize onartuzumab pharmacokinetics in preclinical species.
- To establish a concentration-effect relationship in tumor-bearing mice.
- To project clinical PK parameters and determine target doses for onartuzumab therapy.
Main Methods:
- Tumor growth inhibition models were used to determine tumoristatic concentrations (TSC) in mice.
- Human PK parameters were extrapolated from cynomolgus monkey data using the species-invariant time method.
- Monte Carlo simulations predicted patient exposure to target concentrations.
Main Results:
- Onartuzumab demonstrated faster clearance (CL) in mice and monkeys compared to typical antibodies.
- The estimated TSC in mice was 15 μg/mL.
- Projected human CL ranged from 5.74 to 9.36 mL/d/kg, with a Q3W dose of 10-30 mg/kg predicted to achieve target trough concentrations (Ctrough ss) in ≥95% of patients.
Conclusions:
- Onartuzumab's PK profile supports dose flexibility, allowing for Q1W to Q3W dosing regimens.
- A target Ctrough ss of 15 μg/mL is proposed for clinical efficacy.
- The projected human efficacious dose of 10-30 mg/kg Q3W is supported by PK/PD modeling.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Preclinical Development: Overview
Pharmacodynamic Models: Linear Concentration–Effect Model
Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Problems
Drug Concentration Versus Time Correlation
Two pivotal parameters are the minimum effective concentration (MEC) and the minimum toxic concentration (MTC). The MEC is the lowest drug...
Model-Independent Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Noncompartmental Analysis
One important characteristic of noncompartmental analyses is that drug exposure increases proportionally with increasing doses. This relationship...

