Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2026

Integrated Compensatory Responses in a Human Model of Hemorrhage
Published on: November 20, 2016
Whole-body CT in haemodynamically unstable severely injured patients--a retrospective, multicentre study
Stefan Huber-Wagner1, Peter Biberthaler, Sandra Häberle
1Department of Trauma Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany. huber-wagner@mri.tum.de
Insights
Whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) during trauma resuscitation significantly improves survival rates for major trauma patients, even those in shock. This study suggests WBCT is safe and justified for unstable patients when performed quickly by a trauma team.
Area of Science:
- Trauma Surgery
- Emergency Medicine
- Radiology
Background:
- Current practice often contraindicates whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) in major trauma patients experiencing shock.
- This study challenges this dogma by investigating the impact of WBCT on mortality in shocked trauma patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the effect of performing WBCT during trauma resuscitation on the mortality rates of severely injured patients in shock.
- To determine if WBCT is a safe and effective intervention for hemodynamically unstable trauma patients.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective multicenter cohort study analyzed 16,719 adult blunt major trauma patients.
- Survival rates were compared between patients who received WBCT during resuscitation and those who did not, stratified by shock severity (systolic blood pressure).
- Data from TraumaRegister® (2002-2009) were used to calculate standardized mortality ratios (SMR) and perform logistic regression analyses.
Main Results:
- WBCT was administered to 55.2% of patients, with an overall mortality rate of 17.4% compared to 21.4% in the non-WBCT group (p<0.001).
- For patients in severe shock, WBCT was associated with a lower mortality rate (42.1% vs. 54.9%, p<0.001).
- Adjusted logistic regression confirmed WBCT as an independent predictor of survival, significantly increasing survival chances in moderate (OR=0.73) and severe shock (OR=0.67).
Conclusions:
- WBCT during trauma resuscitation significantly increases survival for both hemodynamically stable and unstable major trauma patients.
- The findings support the safety, feasibility, and justification of timely WBCT in hemodynamically unstable, severely injured patients within a structured trauma environment.
Background:
The current common and dogmatic opinion is that whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) should not be performed in major trauma patients in shock. We aimed to assess whether WBCT during trauma-room treatment has any effect on the mortality of severely injured patients in shock.
Methods:
In a retrospective multicenter cohort study involving 16719 adult blunt major trauma patients we compared the survival of patients who were in moderate, severe or no shock (systolic blood pressure 90-110,<90 or >110 mmHg) at hospital admission and who received WBCT during resuscitation to those who did not. Using data derived from the 2002-2009 version of TraumaRegister®, we determined the observed and predicted mortality and calculated the standardized mortality ratio (SMR) as well as logistic regressions.
Findings:
9233 (55.2%) of the 16719 patients received WBCT. The mean injury severity score was 28.8±12.1. The overall mortality rate was 17.4% (SMR = 0.85, 95%CI 0.81-0.89) for patients with WBCT and 21.4% (SMR = 0.98, 95%CI 0.94-1.02) for those without WBCT (p<0.001). 4280 (25.6%) patients were in moderate shock and 1821 (10.9%) in severe shock. The mortality rate for patients in moderate shock with WBCT was 18.1% (SMR 0.85, CI95% 0.78-0.93) compared to 22.6% (SMR 1.03, CI95% 0.94-1.12) to those without WBCT (p<0.001, p = 0.002 for the SMRs). The mortality rate for patients in severe shock with WBCT was 42.1% (SMR 0.99, CI95% 0.92-1.06) compared to 54.9% (SMR 1.10, CI95% 1.02-1.16) to those without WBCT (p<0.001, p = 0.049 for the SMRs). Adjusted logistic regression analyses showed that WBCT is an independent predictor for survival that significantly increases the chance of survival in patients in moderate shock (OR = 0.73; 95%CI 0.60-0.90, p = 0.002) as well as in severe shock (OR = 0.67; 95%CI 0.52-0.88, p = 0.004). The number needed to scan related to survival was 35 for all patients, 26 for those in moderate shock and 20 for those in severe shock.
Conclusions:
WBCT during trauma resuscitation significantly increased the survival in haemodynamically stable as well as in haemodynamically unstable major trauma patients. Thus, the application of WBCT in haemodynamically unstable severely injured patients seems to be safe, feasible and justified if performed quickly within a well-structured environment and by a well-organized trauma team.
More Related Videos
06:30Complete and Partial Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta for Hemorrhagic Shock
Published on: May 19, 2022
10:38Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
Published on: January 16, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History: