Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2026
Simulator Training for Endovascular Neurosurgery
Published on: May 6, 2020
Building the evidence on simulation validity: comparison of anesthesiologists' communication patterns in real and
Jennifer Weller1, Robert Henderson, Craig S Webster
1From the Centre for Medical and Health Sciences Education, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences (J.W., C.S.W.), Simulation Centre for Patient Safety ( J.T., K.H.), Department of Anaesthesiology (E.D., A.F.M.), University of Auckland, Auckland New Zealand; Human Factors Group, Simulation Training, Air New Zealand (R.H.), Auckland, New Zealand; Medicine Education and Student Office, Faculty of Medicine (B.S.), University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; Department of Medicine, University of Otago (C.F.), Christchurch, New Zealand.
Background:
Effective teamwork is important for patient safety, and verbal communication underpins many dimensions of teamwork. The validity of the simulated environment would be supported if it elicited similar verbal communications to the real setting. The authors hypothesized that anesthesiologists would exhibit similar verbal communication patterns in routine operating room (OR) cases and routine simulated cases. The authors further hypothesized that anesthesiologists would exhibit different communication patterns in routine cases (real or simulated) and simulated cases involving a crisis.
Methods:
Key communications relevant to teamwork were coded from video recordings of anesthesiologists in the OR, routine simulation and crisis simulation and percentages were compared.
Results:
The authors recorded comparable videos of 20 anesthesiologists in the two simulations, and 17 of these anesthesiologists in the OR, generating 400 coded events in the OR, 683 in the routine simulation, and 1,419 in the crisis simulation. The authors found no significant differences in communication patterns in the OR and the routine simulations. The authors did find significant differences in communication patterns between the crisis simulation and both the OR and the routine simulations. Participants rated team communication as realistic and considered their communications occurred with a similar frequency in the simulations as in comparable cases in the OR.
Conclusion:
The similarity of teamwork-related communications elicited from anesthesiologists in simulated cases and the real setting lends support for the ecological validity of the simulation environment and its value in teamwork training. Different communication patterns and frequencies under the challenge of a crisis support the use of simulation to assess crisis management skills.
Related Concept Videos
01:21Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
01:15Techniques of therapeutic communication I: Active Listening, Sharing Observations, Validation, and Using Touch
Therapeutic communication is not the same as social interaction. Social interaction has no goal or purpose and consists of casual information sharing, whereas therapeutic communication has a plan or purpose for the conversation. Therapeutic...