Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Understanding hospital referral rates: a user's guide.

M O Roland1, J Bartholomew, D C Morrell

  • 1Cambridge University School of Clinical Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital.

BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)
|July 14, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Optimizing Pre-Operative Clinical Staging in Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Thoracic cancer·2025
Same author

Long-term outcomes of patients who received extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) following in-hospital cardiac arrest: Analysis of EXCEL registry data.

Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine·2025
Same author

Next-generation precision medicine for suicidality prevention.

Translational psychiatry·2024
Same author

Modelling biofilm development: The importance of considering the link between EPS distribution, detachment mechanisms and physical properties.

Water research·2023
Same author

The COVID-19 pandemic has negatively affected health behaviours in those with pre- heart failure.

Irish medical journal·2023
Same author

Association Between Clinical Frailty Scale Score and Length of Stay in a Complex Discharge Unit.

Irish medical journal·2023
Same journal

Covid-19 vaccine study pulled by US CDC is finally published.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same journal

The doctor will post you now.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same journal

RSV vaccination programme expanded to thousands more vulnerable people.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same journal

Adult gender dysphoria services after the Levy review.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same journal

Blood pressure and cholesterol levels between normal weight and obese adults have narrowed thanks to medications, study says.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same journal

Amos review fallout: national maternity adviser demands answers over removal of "normal birth" harms.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
See all related articles

Calculating general practitioners' referral rates requires careful consideration of denominators, such as consultations for individuals and practice list size for groups. Reliable interpretation necessitates methods to distinguish systematic from random variation, ensuring valid quality of care assessments.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • General Practice
  • Healthcare Quality

Background:

  • Accurate interpretation of general practitioners' (GP) referral rates is crucial for understanding healthcare resource utilization.
  • Previous methods for calculating referral rates may not adequately account for variations in practice and patient populations.
  • Ensuring the validity and reliability of referral data is essential for quality improvement initiatives.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of different calculation methods on GP referral rates.
  • To provide guidelines for the reliable and valid interpretation of GP referral data.
  • To develop a method for distinguishing systematic from random variation in referral rates.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of detailed referral data from a single practice.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of referral rates using different denominators (consultations vs. registered patients).
  • Development of a statistical method to differentiate systematic and random variations in referral data.

    • Main Results:

    • Referral rates for individual GPs should be based on consultations, while practice-level rates can use list size.
    • Controlling for patient age and sex is often unnecessary, but case mix adjustment may be needed for specialty referrals.
    • A method was developed to identify significant systematic variation in referral rates beyond random chance.

    Conclusions:

    • Adherence to 10 proposed guidelines can prevent misinterpretation of GP referral rates.
    • Reliable referral rate calculation is a prerequisite for assessing quality of care, although direct links are not yet established.
    • Further research may be needed to refine methods for analyzing referral variability across specialties and over time.