Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2026

Developing a Salivary Antibody Multiplex Immunoassay to Measure Human Exposure to Environmental Pathogens
Published on: September 12, 2016
Measles transmission in health care waiting rooms: implications for public health response
Kirsty Hope1, Rowena Boyd, Stephen Conaty
1South Western Sydney and Sydney Local Health Districts Public Health Unit, New South Wales, Australia .
Background:
Seventeen cases of locally acquired measles occurred in South Western Sydney and Sydney local health districts between July and October 2011. Three of the cases were known to have at least one dose of measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine. Seven cases were infected within a health care setting waiting room by five index cases. Current national protocols require follow-up of all susceptible contacts in the same waiting room for any length of time for up to two hours after the index case has left.
Methods:
Cases were interviewed using a standardized questionnaire. Information included: demographics, illness and activities during the exposure and infectious periods. Health care settings provided arrival and discharge times, maps of floor layouts and location of patients during stay.
Results:
All health care setting transmission occurred in cases who were present at the same time as their index cases, with crossover time ranging from 20 to 254 minutes. No index case was isolated. Index cases were between day four and six of illness when transmission occurred. None of the five index cases and one of seven secondary cases had received at least one dose of MMR vaccine. Of the seven secondary cases, two were one year of age, one was 17 years old and four were between 30 and 39 years old.
Conclusion:
As Australia moves towards measles elimination, follow-up of cases is important; however, with limited public health resources a targeted response is vital. In this small but well documented series of secondary cases acquired in a health care setting, all were infected following direct, proximate contact of at least 20 minutes. Changes to the national guidelines may be warranted, ensuring that limited resources are focused on following up contacts at greatest risk of disease.
Insights
Measles transmission in healthcare settings occurred after direct contact of at least 20 minutes. Current protocols may need revision to target high-risk contacts for efficient public health resource allocation during measles elimination efforts.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Disease Epidemiology
- Public Health Surveillance
- Vaccinology
Background:
- Seventeen measles cases were reported in Sydney, Australia, between July and October 2011.
- Three cases had received at least one dose of the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine.
- Seven cases were infected in a healthcare setting waiting room from five index cases.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze measles transmission within healthcare settings.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of current contact tracing protocols.
- To inform potential revisions for resource allocation in measles elimination strategies.
Main Methods:
- Case interviews using standardized questionnaires (demographics, illness, activities).
- Collection of healthcare setting data (arrival/discharge times, floor plans, patient locations).
- Analysis of transmission dynamics based on co-location and duration of contact.
Main Results:
- Healthcare-associated transmission occurred with co-location times ranging from 20 to 254 minutes.
- Index cases were infectious between days 4 and 6 of illness and were not isolated.
- None of the five index cases and one of seven secondary cases had received MMR vaccine.
Conclusions:
- Measles transmission in healthcare settings requires direct, proximate contact of at least 20 minutes.
- Current national guidelines for contact follow-up may need adjustment.
- Targeted responses focusing on high-risk contacts are vital for efficient public health resource use in measles elimination.
Related Concept Videos
Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment
Airborne precautions:
Use airborne precautions when treating patients known or suspected to have diseases that spread through the air—for example, tuberculosis or measles. These organisms are present in smaller droplets expelled by an infected person and...
Transmission-based Precautions I: Contact, Enteric, and Droplets
Contact Precautions:
Contact precautions are the measures taken to prevent the transmission of infectious agents, especially epidemiologically important microorganisms such as MRSA or influenza, primarily transmitted through direct or indirect contact with an...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Standard Precaution
Hand hygiene is the most crucial means to prevent the transmission of disease. Employers are legally required to provide their workers with personal protective equipment (PPE) to minimize exposure or contact with...
Steps in Outbreak Investigation
Infectious Diseases and Their Occurrence
