Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2026

06:42
Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
Threat by association: do distant intergroup threats carry-over into local intolerance?
Thijs Bouman1, Martijn van Zomeren, Sabine Otten
1Department of Social Psychology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
The British Journal of Social Psychology
|August 6, 2013
Summary
Threats from distant groups can increase intolerance towards local groups. Abstract symbolic threats, like those to worldviews, strongly predict negative attitudes toward local outgroups.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Intergroup Relations
- Threat Perception
Background:
- Individuals face threats from both local and distant groups.
- It remains unclear if reactions to distant group threats impact local intergroup relations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To experimentally investigate the carry-over effect of intergroup threat.
- To determine if abstract symbolic threats have a greater carry-over potential than other threat types.
Main Methods:
- Conducted one correlational and two experimental studies.
- Examined the relationship between perceived distant symbolic threats and intolerance towards local outgroups.
Main Results:
- Confirmed that distant symbolic threats predict intolerance towards local outgroups.
- Symbolic threats, particularly those perceived as distant, show a significant carry-over effect.
Conclusions:
- Abstract, distant symbolic threats can generalize to negative attitudes toward proximate outgroups.
- Understanding threat perception is crucial for managing intergroup conflict and promoting social cohesion.
Related Concept Videos
In- and Out-Groups
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
Impact of Groups on Groups
Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...
Group Polarization
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who are...
Groupthink
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
When we hold a stereotype about a person, we have expectations that he or she will fulfill that stereotype. A self-fulfilling prophecy is an expectation held by a person that alters his or her behavior in a way that tends to make it true. When we hold stereotypes about a person, we tend to treat the person according to our expectations. This treatment can influence the person to act according to our stereotypic expectations, thus confirming our stereotypic beliefs. Research by Rosenthal and...

