Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Assessing motor impairment after stroke: a pilot reliability study.

C Collin1, D Wade

  • 1Rivermead Rehabilitation Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
|July 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Studying Youth Well-Being Through Minecraft Digital Construction: A Visual and Thematic Study.

The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine·2025
Same author

Prevalence, characteristics and management of migraine patients with triptan failure in primary care: the EMR France-Mig study.

The journal of headache and pain·2025
Same author

A slobbering appendix.

Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica·2025
Same author

Publisher Correction: Muscle abnormalities in Long COVID.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Reply: Muscle abnormalities in Long COVID.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

[Lentiviral vectors].

Virologie (Montrouge, France)·2022
Same journal

Global epidemiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry·2026
Same journal

Diagnostic accuracy of a two-cut-off approach using the FAQ/MMSE ratio and FAQ for clinical preselection of patients for anti-amyloid therapy.

Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry·2026
Same journal

Cancer risk and mortality in patients with multiple sclerosis in Finland: a retrospective population-based cohort study.

Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry·2026
Same journal

Visuospatial working memory in Huntington's disease: behavioural and structural brain correlates.

Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry·2026
Same journal

Characteristics and outcomes in electric scooter-related traumatic brain injuries in Helsinki.

Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry·2026
Same journal

Chronological ageing and ovarian reserve in MS: insights from anti-Müllerian hormone and disability progression.

Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry·2026
See all related articles

The Motricity Index (MI) and Trunk Control Test (TCT) are valid, reliable, and quick motor function tests post-stroke. They show equal sensitivity to change as the Rivermead Motor Assessment (RMA), with TCT predicting walking ability.

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Rehabilitation Medicine
  • Physical Therapy

Background:

  • Stroke significantly impacts motor function, necessitating accurate assessment tools.
  • Existing physiotherapy assessments can be time-consuming.
  • Objective and efficient measurement of motor recovery is crucial for effective rehabilitation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the validity, reliability, and sensitivity of the Motricity Index (MI) and Trunk Control Test (TCT) against the Rivermead Motor Assessment (RMA) in post-stroke patients.
  • To evaluate the predictive value of MI and TCT for long-term motor outcomes, specifically walking ability.
  • To determine the efficiency of MI and TCT in clinical settings.

Main Methods:

  • Longitudinal assessment of stroke survivors using MI, TCT, and RMA at regular intervals.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Statistical analysis to determine validity, reliability, and sensitivity to change for each test.
  • Correlation analysis between TCT scores and eventual walking ability.

    • Main Results:

    • The MI and TCT demonstrated good validity and reliability.
    • Both MI and TCT were generally quicker to administer than the RMA.
    • All three tests (MI, TCT, RMA) exhibited comparable sensitivity in detecting motor function changes over time.
    • The TCT showed significant predictive value for future walking ability.

    Conclusions:

    • The MI and TCT are valid, reliable, and efficient tools for assessing motor function after stroke.
    • These shorter tests offer a practical alternative to the RMA without compromising sensitivity to change.
    • The TCT is a valuable predictor of walking recovery, aiding in rehabilitation planning.