Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 9, 2026

In Vitro Application of a Wireless Sensor in Flexion-Extension Gap Balance of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
07:33

In Vitro Application of a Wireless Sensor in Flexion-Extension Gap Balance of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

Published on: May 5, 2023

Knee rotation after unicompartmental arthroplasty.

I Ivarsson1, J Gillquist, K Sommerlath

  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.

Clinical Biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)
|August 7, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Knee replacement surgery did not alter tibial rotation compared to pre-surgery measurements. External rotation was less in patients than in healthy knees, suggesting ligaments play a key role in knee rotation restriction.

Related Concept Videos

Knee Joint01:23

Knee Joint

The knee joint is the most complicated joint in the body. It consists of three articulations– two tibiofemoral and one patellofemoral. As is characteristic of synovial joints, the knee joint has a thin articular capsule that partially surrounds this joint cavity. Additionally, several ligaments, muscles, and cartilaginous structures support the movement of the knee.
A total of seven ligaments support the knee joint. The patellar ligament, which is also attached to the quadriceps femoris group...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Local bisphosphonate reduces migration and formation of radiolucent lines adjacent to cemented acetabular components.

The bone & joint journal·2017
Same author

Biomechanical characteristics of different artificial substitutes for rabbit medial meniscus and effect of prosthesis size on knee cartilage.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2013
Same author

Design and testing of a flexible hip prosthesis.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2013
Same author

Thoraco-abdominal perimetry for partitioning of the tidal volume into fractions due to rib cage expansion and diaphragmatic descent.

Upsala journal of medical sciences·2010
Same author

[Not Available].

Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie·2006
Same author

Fluoroscopic validation of electrogoniometrically measured femorotibial translation in healthy and ACL deficient subjects.

Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports·2002

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Biomechanics
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Unicompartmental knee replacement is a common procedure for knee osteoarthritis.
  • Understanding knee biomechanics, specifically rotation, is crucial for optimizing surgical outcomes.
  • Limited data exists on the impact of unicompartmental knee replacement on knee rotation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effect of unicompartmental knee replacement on knee rotation.
  • To compare rotational differences between constrained and non-constrained prostheses.
  • To investigate the role of ligaments versus prosthesis design in rotational stability.

Main Methods:

  • Twenty patients undergoing unicompartmental knee replacement were assessed.
  • Knee rotation was measured using the Genucom Knee Analysis System before and 6 months after surgery.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 9, 2026

In Vitro Application of a Wireless Sensor in Flexion-Extension Gap Balance of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
07:33

In Vitro Application of a Wireless Sensor in Flexion-Extension Gap Balance of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

Published on: May 5, 2023

  • Measurements were compared to 14 healthy control knees.
  • Main Results:

    • No significant difference in knee rotation was observed between pre- and postoperative measurements.
    • Patients exhibited less external tibial rotation compared to healthy controls (P < 0.01).
    • No rotational difference was found between constrained (PCA) and non-constrained (Oxford) prostheses.

    Conclusions:

    • Unicompartmental knee replacement does not significantly alter rotational kinematics.
    • Ligamentous structures appear to be more critical for rotational restriction than prosthetic design.
    • Extension lag was not a significant factor influencing rotational outcomes.