Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2026

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
A clinical predictive score for mood disorder risk in low-income primary care settings
P A Vöhringer1, M I Jimenez, M A Igor
1Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile, Unidad de Trastornos del Ánimo, Clínica Psiquiátrica Universitaria, Facultad Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Mood Disorders Program, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States; Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States; Graduate Program, Clinical and Translational Science Institute (CTSI), Sackler School of Graduate Biomedical Sciences, Tufts University, Boston, MA, United States.
Background:
Despite availability of validated screening tests for mood disorders, busy general practitioners (GPs) often lack the time to use them routinely. This study aimed to develop a simplified clinical predictive score to help screen for presence of current mood disorder in low-income primary care settings.
Methods:
In a cross-sectional study, 197 patients seen at 10 primary care centers in Santiago, Chile completed self-administered screening tools for mood disorders: the Patient Health questionnaire (PHQ-9) and the Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ). To determine participants' current-point mood disorder status, trained clinicians applied a gold-standard diagnostic interview (SCID-I). A simplified clinical predictive model (CM) was developed based on clinical features and selected questions from the screening tools. Using CM, a clinical predictive score (PS) was developed. Full PHQ-9 and GP assessment were compared with PS.
Results:
Using multivariate logistic regression, clinical and demographic variables predictive of current mood disorder were identified for a simplified 8-point predictive score (PS). PS had better discrimination than GP assessment (auROC-statistic=0.80 [95% CI 0.72, 0.85] vs. 0.58 [95% CI 0.52, 0.62] p-value <0.0001), but not as good as the full PHQ-9 (0.89 [95% CI 0.85, 0.93], p-value=0.03). Compared with GP assessment, PS increased sensitivity by 50% at a fixed specificity of 90%. Administered in a typical primary care clinical population, it correctly predicted almost 80% of cases.
Limitations:
Further research must verify external validity of the PS.
Conclusion:
An easily administered clinical predictive score determined, with reasonable accuracy, the current risk of mood disorders in low-income primary care settings.
Related Concept Videos
Depressive Disorders: MDD and Dysthymia
Depressive Disorders: Etiology
Biological Factors in Depression
Biological predispositions significantly influence the risk of developing depressive disorders. Genetic studies highlight the role of variations in the serotonin transporter...
Relative Risk
Depression: Overview
