Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2026

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Wearable cardioverter-defibrillator use in patients perceived to be at high risk early post-myocardial infarction
Andrew E Epstein1, William T Abraham2, Nicole R Bianco3
1Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Insights
The wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD) effectively treated sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) in 1.4% of high-risk myocardial infarction (MI) patients during mandated waiting periods. Risk was highest early, suggesting WCD benefits for selected patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Electrophysiology
Background:
- Current guidelines mandate waiting periods (40 days or 3 months) before implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) placement post-myocardial infarction (MI).
- These waiting periods are based on acute revascularization status.
- Patient selection for high risk of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) is crucial during this interval.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the utilization and effectiveness of the wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD).
- To describe WCD usage in patients at high risk for SCA following MI.
- To analyze outcomes during mandated post-MI waiting periods.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of the WCD medical order registry.
- Inclusion criteria: recent MI with ejection fraction ≤35% or ICD-9 code 410.xx.
- Matching WCD data with patient characteristics and outcomes.
Main Results:
- 8,453 patients used WCDs between 2005-2011; 1.6% received appropriate shocks for SCA.
- 91% of shocked patients were resuscitated from ventricular arrhythmia.
- Shock success rates were 84% in non-revascularized and 95% in revascularized patients, with highest risk in the first month.
Conclusions:
- WCD successfully treated SCA in 1.4% of patients during post-MI waiting periods.
- The highest risk for SCA occurred within the first month of WCD use.
- WCDs may offer significant benefit for carefully selected high-risk patients early after MI.
Objectives:
The aim of this study was to describe usage of the wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD) during mandated waiting periods following myocardial infarction (MI) for patients perceived to be at high risk for sudden cardiac arrest (SCA).
Background:
Current device guidelines and insurance coverage require waiting periods of either 40 days or 3 months before implanting a cardioverter-defibrillator post-myocardial infarction (MI), depending on whether or not acute revascularization was undertaken.
Methods:
We assessed characteristics of and outcomes for patients who had a WCD prescribed in the first 3 months post-MI. The WCD medical order registry was searched for patients who were coded as having had a "recent MI with ejection fraction ≤35%" or given an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision 410.xx diagnostic code (acute MI), and then matched to device-recorded data.
Results:
Between September 2005 and July 2011, 8,453 unique patients (age 62.7 ± 12.7 years, 73% male) matched study criteria. A total of 133 patients (1.6%) received 309 appropriate shocks. Of these patients, 91% were resuscitated from a ventricular arrhythmia. For shocked patients, the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was ≤30% in 106, 30% to 35% in 17, >36% in 8, and not reported in 2 patients. Of the 38% of patients not revascularized, 84% had a LVEF ≤30%; of the 62% of patients revascularized, 77% had a LVEF ≤30%. The median time from the index MI to WCD therapy was 16 days. Of the treated patients, 75% received treatment in the first month, and 96% within the first 3 months of use. Shock success resulting in survival was 84% in nonrevascularized and 95% in revascularized patients.
Conclusions:
During the 40-day and 3-month waiting periods in patients post-MI, the WCD successfully treated SCA in 1.4%, and the risk was highest in the first month of WCD use. The WCD may benefit individual patients selected for high risk of SCA early post-MI.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac muscle...
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management

