Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Working Memory01:24

Working Memory

Working memory refers to a combination of components, including short-term memory and attention, that allow an individual to hold information temporarily as we perform cognitive tasks. It is an essential cognitive function that enables the execution of complex tasks such as problem-solving, comprehension, and reasoning. Unlike short-term memory, which simply involves the storage of information for a brief period, working memory involves the active manipulation and processing of this information.
Eyewitness Memory01:22

Eyewitness Memory

Eyewitness memory refers to the recollection of events by someone who has directly witnessed them, often serving as critical evidence in legal settings. This type of memory is commonly used in criminal cases where a witness describes details like a suspect's appearance, clothing, or behavior during a crime. However, despite its perceived reliability, eyewitness memory is prone to significant errors.
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function like a...
Implicit Memories01:24

Implicit Memories

Implicit memories, also known as non-declarative memories, are long-term memories that function outside of conscious awareness. These memories influence behavior and skills without explicit knowledge. This type of memory is evident in tasks like playing tennis, snowboarding, and texting. Implicit memory has three subsystems: procedural memory, conditioning, and priming. This type of memory is essential in various activities, from everyday tasks to specialized skills.
One key aspect of implicit...
Chunking and Rehearsal in Sensory Memory01:22

Chunking and Rehearsal in Sensory Memory

Improving short-term memory can be achieved through techniques like chunking and rehearsal. Chunking involves organizing information into larger, more manageable units. This technique is particularly useful for information that exceeds the typical memory span of between five and nine items. For instance, logging into an online account with a password like "ta89vq0179gz" involves grouping letters and numbers into three chunks—ta89, vq01, and 79gz. It makes large amounts of information more...
Understanding Memory01:19

Understanding Memory

Memory is the retention of information or experiences over time, facilitated through three main processes: encoding, storage, and retrieval. Encoding is the process of inputting information into the memory system. For instance, when listening to a lecture, watching a play, reading a book, or having a conversation, the brain is actively encoding information. This initial stage involves transforming sensory input into a form that can be processed and stored by the brain. Various factors, such as...
System of Memory01:23

System of Memory

Memory is categorized into three major systems: sensory memory, short-term memory (STM), and long-term memory (LTM). These systems differ in their capacity and the duration for which they can hold information. Sensory memory captures raw sensory input from the environment, holding it for just a few seconds or less. For example, on hearing a brief, loud sound, like a car horn honking, the sound seems to linger in the mind for a moment even after it stops. This is an instance of sensory memory...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Rates of Sufficient Sleep Among University Students in the United States from 2000 to 2023.

Sleep·2026
Same author

Fidelity of remote, video-monitored experimental total sleep deprivation.

Sleep·2026
Same author

YASA automated sleep staging performance across seven nights of normal sleep and sleep restriction.

Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine·2026
Same author

Sleep and circadian predictors of academic performance and retention in STEM pathways: a longitudinal study in university freshmen.

Advances in physiology education·2026
Same author

Long-Term Forgetting Rates Vary by Bloom's Taxonomy Levels but Not Initial Learning in DPT Education.

Physical therapy·2025
Same author

Bidirectionality and the application of the integrated neurocognitive model of technological cognition to late life cognitive health.

Cognitive neuroscience·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 9, 2026

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory
07:59

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory

Published on: June 14, 2019

The Dynamic Multiprocess Framework: evidence from prospective memory with contextual variability.

Michael K Scullin1, Mark A McDaniel, Jill Talley Shelton

  • 1Department of Psychology, Washington University in St. Louis, United States. michael.scullin@emory.edu

Cognitive Psychology
|August 7, 2013
PubMed
Summary

This study shows that people dynamically switch between effortful monitoring and automatic spontaneous retrieval to remember future intentions (prospective memory). Monitoring is engaged when cues are expected, and spontaneous retrieval supports memory when cues are not anticipated.

Keywords:
Cognitive controlIntentionsMonitoringProspective memorySpontaneous retrieval

More Related Videos

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory
07:26

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory

Published on: January 31, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 9, 2026

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory
07:59

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory

Published on: June 14, 2019

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory
07:26

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory

Published on: January 31, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Prospective memory involves remembering to perform future intentions.
  • Previous research debated whether prospective memory relies on effortful monitoring or spontaneous cue-driven retrieval.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To test the Dynamic Multiprocess Framework for prospective memory.
  • To investigate the dynamic interplay between monitoring and spontaneous retrieval.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed ongoing tasks with infrequent prospective memory cues across different contexts.
  • Monitoring was assessed via ongoing task costs.
  • Retention intervals of 20 minutes and 12 hours were used.

Main Results:

  • Monitoring patterns were consistent across contexts.
  • Monitoring occurred only after the first prospective memory cue.
  • Successful spontaneous retrieval led to subsequent monitoring.

Conclusions:

  • The Dynamic Multiprocess Framework is supported.
  • Individuals dynamically engage monitoring based on cue expectation.
  • Spontaneous retrieval mechanisms support prospective memory when monitoring is disengaged.