Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2026
05:26
Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
Published on: January 7, 2019
Exploring trait assessment of samples, persons, and cultures
1a Baltimore , Maryland.
Journal of Personality Assessment
|August 9, 2013
Summary
This study emphasizes retest reliability over internal consistency for personality trait assessment. Combining multiple informants and exploring culture-level traits are crucial for future research and clinical practice.
Area of Science:
- Psychological assessment
- Personality psychology
- Cross-cultural psychology
Background:
- Personality trait assessment is critical in research and clinical practice.
- Current methods may overemphasize internal consistency, potentially neglecting other reliability aspects.
- Understanding personality at individual and cultural levels is essential.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide a broad overview of personality trait assessment.
- To discuss future directions for research and clinical practice in personality assessment.
- To critically evaluate principles of scale development and propose improvements.
Main Methods:
- Review of basic principles of scale development in personality assessment.
- Argument for prioritizing retest reliability over internal consistency.
- Advocacy for multi-informant assessment and presentation of statistical tools for integration.
- Discussion of culture-level traits including ethos, national character stereotypes, and aggregated personality traits.
Main Results:
- Internal consistency in scale development has been overemphasized.
- Retest reliability is crucial for accurate individual assessment.
- Multi-informant assessments, supported by statistical tools, enhance protocol validity.
- Evidence supports the validity of aggregated personality traits as culture-level indicators, though understanding remains limited.
Conclusions:
- Future personality assessment research and practice should prioritize retest reliability and multi-informant approaches.
- Aggregated personality traits offer a valid lens for understanding culture-level characteristics.
- Further exploration of culture-level trait profiles is warranted to advance psychological science.
Related Concept Videos
01:26Cultural Influences on Personality
Individualist and collectivist cultures emphasize different core values, shaping personality in distinct ways. In individualist cultures, such as those in the United States, England, and Australia, people prioritize independence, competition, and personal achievement. These societies tend to promote self-focused traits, with individuals often reporting higher levels of self-esteem. In contrast, collectivist cultures, commonly found in regions like Asia, Africa, and South America, emphasize...
01:21Trait Centrality
Trait centrality refers to the degree to which a particular characteristic influences the overall impression of an individual. Some traits exert a disproportionately strong impact on perception, shaping how people interpret other attributes of a person. Solomon Asch first systematically studied this phenomenon in 1946.Asch’s Experiment on Trait CentralityAsch's seminal study demonstrated the centrality of certain traits through a controlled experiment. Participants were presented with a list of...
01:20Trait Theory by Gordon Allport
Gordon Allport, often regarded as the father of American personality psychology, developed a theory that emphasized the importance of understanding people in their present lives rather than focusing on their past, as psychoanalysis did. Allport believed that personality should be studied in healthy, well-adjusted individuals rather than those with psychological problems. He was particularly interested in defining traits, which he saw as fundamental mental structures that guide behavior across...
01:22Self-Report Tests of Personality
Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
01:24Cattell's 16 Personality Factors
Raymond Cattell's trait theory offers a structured framework for understanding personality by distinguishing between two critical traits: surface and source traits. Surface traits are observable patterns of behavior, such as indecisiveness, anxiety, and irrational fears. These traits are less stable, varying across situations and over time. This means that they are less helpful in understanding the deeper aspects of an individual's personality.
In contrast, source traits are the fundamental,...
In contrast, source traits are the fundamental,...
01:17Traits and States
Personality traits represent consistent patterns in behavior, thoughts, and emotions, reflecting an individual's tendencies across various situations. For example, extraversion, a well-known trait, manifests in individuals as talkative, energetic, and enthusiastic behaviors. These traits are stable over time, offering a reliable framework for predicting how people might act in different contexts. However, they do not define every moment of an individual's life. In contrast to traits, states are...