Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Community Based Intervention01:30

Community Based Intervention

Community-based interventions in mental health represent a paradigm shift from institution-centered care to treatments embedded within the fabric of local communities. By prioritizing inclusion and leveraging existing societal structures, this approach fosters a supportive environment conducive to addressing mental health challenges while promoting individual dignity and agency.
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model01:29

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...
Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation01:20

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...
Social Foundations of Self III: Self-Evaluation01:30

Social Foundations of Self III: Self-Evaluation

Self-evaluation is the process by which individuals assess their abilities, behaviors, and characteristics based on feedback from others. Charles H. Cooley observed that a person’s self-perception is primarily influenced by how others see and judge them. He suggested that individuals form their identities based on their interpretations of others' reactions. As a result, social interactions play a crucial role in shaping self-esteem and personal identity. These external evaluations often blend...
Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions01:29

Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions

Aligning actions are communicative strategies individuals employ to maintain social harmony and preserve personal identity in the face of potential disruptions to social norms. These actions are particularly important in managing social impressions when one's behavior might be seen as inappropriate, incompetent, or morally questionable.Types of Aligning ActionsThe three principal types of aligning actions are disclaimers, accounts, and apologies.DisclaimersDisclaimers are preventive; they are...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Firearm suicide risk beliefs and prevention: The role of fear of community violence and firearm ownership for protection.

Journal of psychiatric research·2024
Same author

Using Collective Impact to Develop a Community-Led Initiative for Improving Black Infant Mortality.

Health promotion practice·2021
Same author

Evidence of Effectiveness of a Home Visitation Program on Infant Weight Gain and Breastfeeding.

Maternal and child health journal·2020
Same author

An Unexpected, Yet Welcomed Outcome of the St. Louis Healthy Start Program.

Maternal and child health journal·2018
Same author

Flipping Classrooms in a School of Public Health.

Frontiers in public health·2017
Same author

Evaluating a train-the-trainer approach for improving capacity for evidence-based decision making in public health.

BMC health services research·2015

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 9, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

A method for building evaluation competency among community-based organizations.

Cheryl M Kelly1, Jessi LaRose, Darcell P Scharff

  • 11University of Colorado Colorado Springs, Colorado Springs, CO, USA.

Health Promotion Practice
|August 9, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Community-based organizations can build evaluation capacity through tailored technical assistance and training. This practical approach enhances program evaluation skills, improving project outcomes and sustainability.

Keywords:
community organizationhealth promotionprogram planning and evaluation

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 9, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Community Health
  • Program Evaluation

Background:

  • Community-based organizations (CBOs) frequently encounter capacity limitations, including time, staff, and expertise, hindering effective program and policy evaluation.
  • Building evaluation competency within CBOs is crucial for assessing environmental changes and program effectiveness.
  • Lack of evaluation skills can impede the success and sustainability of community-focused initiatives.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a practical, adaptable approach and toolkit for enhancing evaluation capacity in community organizations.
  • To guide evaluators, academic partners, and funders in delivering effective technical assistance for skill-building.
  • To support CBOs in evaluating their programs, policies, and environmental change initiatives.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a collaborative approach with universities and a health foundation to provide intensive technical assistance.
  • Delivered tailored support to 19 community-based organizations implementing obesity prevention projects.
  • Designed flexible processes and tools adaptable to varying organizational capacities and needs.

Main Results:

  • The technical assistance approach successfully built evaluation competency within participating community organizations.
  • Tailored tools and processes facilitated effective program evaluation, even with limited CBO resources.
  • The developed methods served as effective templates for ongoing technical assistance.

Conclusions:

  • Providing targeted evaluation technical assistance and training is a feasible strategy to bolster CBO capacity.
  • The described approach and tools can be replicated by various stakeholders to support CBOs in evaluation endeavors.
  • Lessons learned can inform future collaborations between evaluators, funders, academic institutions, and community organizations.