Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Interference: Path Lengths01:10

Interference: Path Lengths

Consider two sources of sound, that may or may not be in phase, emitting waves at a single frequency, and consider the frequencies to be the same.
Two special sources may be considered when they are in phase. This can be easily achieved by feeding the two sources from the same source. An example would be synchronizing the two speakers by feeding them with the same source, such as the sound waves produced by a tuning fork. This setup ensures that the two sources have the same frequency and are...
Echo01:06

Echo

The human ear cannot distinguish between two sources of sound if they happen to reach within a specific time interval, typically 0.1 seconds apart. More than this, and they are perceived as separate sources.
Imagine the sound is reflected back to the ears. Assuming that the source is very close to the human, the difference between hearing the two sounds—the emitted sound and the reflected sound—may be more than the minimum time for perceiving distinct sounds. If this is the case, then the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

"We can make awful mistakes": exploring briefing and debriefing practices in hearing care appointments involving spoken language interpreters.

International journal of audiology·2026
Same author

Working With Spoken Language Interpreters: Strengthening Clinician-Interpreter Collaboration for Accessible Hearing Care.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same author

Identifying older adults' communication support needs and preferences: a scoping review of measurement instruments.

The Gerontologist·2026
Same author

Establishing normative data for five new temporal auditory processing tests in primary-school aged children.

International journal of audiology·2026
Same author

Language, Speech Production, Functional Performance, and Social Skills of 3-Year-Old Children With Congenital Unilateral Hearing Loss: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Hearing Intervention.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2026
Same author

Reduced neural speech tracking in adolescents with listening difficulty.

Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 9, 2026

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms
08:05

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms

Published on: February 10, 2016

The importance of interaural time differences and level differences in spatial release from masking.

Helen Glyde1, Jörg M Buchholz, Harvey Dillon

  • 1The HEARing Cooperative Research Centre, 550 Swanston Street, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia. helen.glyde@nal.gov.au

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|August 10, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Interaural level differences (ILDs) significantly improve speech understanding in noise, comparable to using both ILDs and interaural time differences (ITDs). Interaural time differences alone offer minimal benefit for spatial release from masking.

More Related Videos

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
09:13

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 22, 2015

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents
10:27

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents

Published on: April 19, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 9, 2026

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms
08:05

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms

Published on: February 10, 2016

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
09:13

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 22, 2015

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents
10:27

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents

Published on: April 19, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Auditory neuroscience
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Speech perception

Background:

  • Spatial cues like interaural time differences (ITDs) and interaural level differences (ILDs) enhance speech understanding in noisy environments.
  • Previous research highlights the importance of these binaural cues for auditory spatial perception.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if ILDs or ITDs alone can produce spatial release from masking (SRM).
  • To compare the effectiveness of isolated ILDs and ITDs in a speech-on-speech masking scenario.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LiSN-S) with twelve adult participants.
  • Manipulated interaural cues (ITDs, ILDs) in the speech and masker stimuli.
  • Presented maskers symmetrically around the listener.

Main Results:

  • Interaural level differences (ILDs) yielded substantial spatial release from masking (SRM).
  • The SRM provided by ILDs was comparable to that achieved with combined ITDs and ILDs.
  • Interaural time differences (ITDs) alone resulted in significantly less SRM.

Conclusions:

  • ILDs are a potent cue for achieving spatial release from masking in speech perception.
  • While both ITDs and ILDs contribute to spatial hearing, ILDs appear to be the dominant factor in this specific speech-on-speech masking paradigm.
  • Further research can explore the combined effects and individual contributions of binaural cues in diverse listening conditions.