Determinants of percutaneous coronary intervention vs coronary artery bypass grafting: an interprovincial comparison

Maral Ouzounian1, William Ghali, Alexandra M Yip

  • 1Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Insights

Significant differences exist in how percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are used across Canadian provinces. Patient factors influence choices, but other elements also play a role in revascularization decisions.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Health Services Research
  • Interventional Cardiology

Background:

  • Utilization of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) shows significant variation.
  • Understanding predictors of revascularization mode is crucial for standardized care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate differences in predictors for PCI versus CABG across three Canadian provincial jurisdictions.
  • To analyze trends and variations in revascularization strategies over time.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing PCI or isolated CABG in British Columbia, Alberta, and Nova Scotia (1996-2007).
  • Calculation of age- and sex-standardized rates and PCI to CABG ratios.
  • Logistic regression models used to identify independent predictors of revascularization choice.

Main Results:

  • Over 32,000 CABG and 69,000 PCI procedures were performed.
  • PCI to CABG ratios increased in all provinces, but varied significantly between them.
  • Female sex and acute coronary syndrome favored PCI; older age, complex disease, and diabetes favored CABG.

Conclusions:

  • Substantial interprovincial variability in PCI to CABG ratios exists.
  • While patient factors predict revascularization choice, non-clinical factors also contribute significantly.
  • Further research is needed to understand and address these disparities in cardiac care.
Abstract