Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2026

Synthesis of Non-uniformly Pr-doped SrTiO3 Ceramics and Their Thermoelectric Properties
Published on: August 15, 2015
Enhanced thermoelectric figure of merit in stannite-kuramite solid solutions Cu(2+x)Fe(1-x)SnS(4-y) (x = 0-1) with
Yosuke Goto1, Fumihiko Naito, Rina Sato
1Department of Applied Physics and Physico-Informatics, Faculty of Science and Technology, Keio University, 3-14-1 Hiyoshi, Yokohama 223-8522, Japan. 60508588@z8.keio.jp
Abstract:
In this Article, we elucidate the structural and thermoelectric properties of stannite-kuramite solid solutions, Cu(2+x)Fe(1-x)SnS(4-y) (x = 0-1), with sulfur defects (y) ≤ 0.4. Structural analysis revealed that anisotropy decreases and Cu/Sn disorder increases with an increase in x. The samples with x = 0.8-1 exhibit degenerate conduction, whereas the Seebeck coefficient (S) remains relatively high, S ≈ 100 μV K(-1) for x = 0.8 at 300 K. Thermal conductivities (κ) of the solid solutions are in the range 10(-3)-10(-2) W cm(-1) K(-1), which is close to the κ value of silicon dioxide. The dimensionless figure of merit (ZT) reaches 0.044 for x = 0.8 at 300 K. The ZT is enhanced significantly by an increase in temperature and is doubly larger than that of x = 0 at 300 K. These findings allow us to attain higher ZT values through optimization of chemical composition.
More Related Videos
04:09Demonstrating the Simplicity and In Situ Temperature Monitoring of the Mechanochemical Synthesis of Metal Chalcogenides Suitable for Thermoelectrics
Published on: August 30, 2024
09:06Visualizing Uniaxial-strain Manipulation of Antiferromagnetic Domains in Fe1+YTe Using a Spin-polarized Scanning Tunneling Microscope
Published on: March 24, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Ferromagnetism
Imperfections in Crystal Structure: Stoichiometric Point Defects
Types Of Superconductors
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...